Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > GOVERNMENT & ADMINISTRATIVE LAW > Military Law

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-20-2007, 11:07 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4

SOFA divorce


A quick question about divorce. If divorce is obtained from states yet marriage is in Korea, shouldn't divorce also happen in Korea? Question arises from soldier who obtained divorce without consent of x-wife and Army promptly evicted x-wife. X-wife is angry and wants help. She got soldier to agree to alimony, but soldier went almost immediately AWOL claiming suicide tendenacies etc. Shouldn't Army continue to support wife until member is no longer in Army or obtains legal divorce. Clearly the divorce looks fraudulent and x-wife claimed she was never served, yet lived in Army housing.

Both parties are in Korea still. Does SOFA apply in civil divorce matters?
  #2  
Old 10-20-2007, 11:40 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9
Has she spoken to anyone at a JAG office?
  #3  
Old 10-21-2007, 01:55 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4
Jag office dismissed her saying they cannot represent her in civil matter. I suggested she show the
following case which is pretty similar and discuss the idea of suing the Govt which they will of course be all ears. She only wants continued support for housing until she gets back on her feet.

[url]http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/index.cfm?fa=opinions.showOpinion&filename=350700MAJ[/url]

Seems that its easy to convince the courts not to have the spouse served?

She cannot divorce by Korean law until the Korean courts recognize divorce, so I imagine he falls into the same situation given SOFA. Pretty slick to obtain divorce back in home state and file various documents which exclude her from proceedings. She has told just about everyone at USFK that she never signed a thing and was merely presented with divorce papers and eviction notice on the same day by the unit commander.
  #4  
Old 10-21-2007, 07:13 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: O~HI~O
Posts: 1,986
If she is without funds, then she should try and contact the Legal Society, or check to
see if there is a Law School close by that may have a free legal clinic.
__________________
Quote:
Ecc 7:1 A good name [is] better than precious ointment; and the day of death than the day of one's birth.

"There are two letter[s] in the word of [Life] that, in part gives direct meaning to it, "IF."" By /SL/ aka., April 23, 2008

Only by cutting through the darkness of ignorance, and prejudice can we achieve true justice; and
to all those who corrupt the search for truth be warned, the "Sword of Justice" cuts both ways!

Last edited by SHORTY LONG; 10-21-2007 at 09:02 AM. Reason: Misread post, thus, my reply was incorrect. Sorry!
  #5  
Old 10-21-2007, 08:54 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Back from Iraq
Posts: 604
When it comes to divorce, the Army does not care where the papers come from. As long as it is a legally binding divorce decree in the US, it is treated as such on ANY installation in the world.

Just so you know, the bases in Korea are *technically* sovereign US Soil.

Just because she is foreign doesn't mean she can remain married to him forever against his will.

And the case you cited is not applicable in this case... The party filed in Washington State, but commenced with proceedings via Japanese Courts. The divorce in the US was stayed pending his return to continue with the proceedings, yet the divorce in Japan was completed during this time. The entire case was based upon this, and the fact that he attempted to move the Court of Jurisdiction to Virginia AFTER the divorce was final in Japan.

Why should the Army house the Ex-Wife when the divorce is final? Because she didn't think he would actually file? She couldn't figure out when the were separated that divorce was imminent? She couldn't deduce that he would be filing for divorce when he went home?
__________________
Just some schmuck with a truck... And a high I.Q.

"A young man who does not have what it takes to perform military service is not likely to have what it takes to make a living." - John F. Kennedy

I do not help deserters...

Quote:
Originally Posted by IsabellaSoriano View Post
that's like saying robbing a doughnut shop is entrapment.
  #6  
Old 10-21-2007, 10:01 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4
I think that its interesting that USFK has a policy letter which requires permission to marry a Korean, yet doesn't have policy regarding divorce. How is the wife supposed to know where the husband files and yet he can file "wavier for appearance" and "waiver of notification to serve", then obtain divorce without respect to the wifes circumstances (ie, job, money etc). Try obtaining a divorce when the other party doesn't work and you will find the courts award something called "alimony". It wreaks of fraudulent divorce yet is not investigated by the Army? In the case of the Korean, the marriage was in Korea and they both resided in Korea, so how did the service member avoid SOFA or does SOFA even mean anything? Doesn't the wife get due process in the Korean courts? I thought SOFA means that the service member abides by both U.S. and Korean law... In both the case in Korea and in Japan, the service member shops around for the "best deal". In the case of the Korean wife- nothing. While it is U.S. soil, the marriage paper was "Korean" and recognized by the U.S. The Korean lawyer says that for the wife to get a divorce, she will have to file in Korea because Korean law doesn't recognize the U.S. divorce. Interesting indeed because SOFA is clearly not in play!
  #7  
Old 10-29-2007, 11:18 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 83
He doesn't need the wife's "consent" to get a divorce, however... did she know he filed? What did he file with the court to exclude her? She was living in housing, so he obviously knew how to contact her... maybe she needs to get a lawyer in the State that the divorce was filed in. Civil matters aren't a matter for JAG...they're right, it's not their problem... but he may have misled the court to get his divorce without her having a right to representation. No court is going to have divorce proceedings without one party unless they are completely unavailable.... she had a right to also file petitions to the court.
  #8  
Old 11-03-2007, 11:03 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4
Well, more info came in with all the court documents. He provided the court with a Korean notary which waived her right to be served and appear for the proceedings. It should be quick to get people to declare the divorce as fraud given its not in accordance with standards of: Uniform Recognition of Acknowledgements Act [sec 26-3-20(4)], and CID is now investigating.
  #9  
Old 11-06-2007, 06:54 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18
I wish I could help you reslove your problem with this sudden and unexpected divorce. It sounds to me that this young servicemen wasn't ready for commitment or that he took his vow's of marriage too lightly. I fell in love with a Korean woman when my ship was stationed in Soel but she was unavailable at the time. So I married my American sweetheart when I returned to the US.

Last edited by Shellback; 11-06-2007 at 07:53 PM.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:11 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.