HOME LAW INSURANCE

Search      

Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Mortgages, Refinancing & Foreclosure
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



               


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 02-19-2008, 07:11 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,471
Quote:
Originally Posted by seniorjudge View Post
I think you are correct; but who is (are?) the guilty party (parties?) here.

Both of them, I'd say.
Agreed. The lender had the right to know BEFORE they funded, whether a new debt obligation on the part of the buyer was being created. This buyer SHOULD have brought it up at the closing table and asked their closer, innocently of course, if this little "deal" was ok or a problem for the lender. Betcha the lender would not have been happy.

They both LIED in the HUD!
__________________
Adoptive parents ARE "real" parents. Sharing genes is not what makes you a "parent"!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:22 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by nextwife View Post
Agreed. The lender had the right to know BEFORE they funded, whether a new debt obligation on the part of the buyer was being created. This buyer SHOULD have brought it up at the closing table and asked their closer, innocently of course, if this little "deal" was ok or a problem for the lender. Betcha the lender would not have been happy.

They both LIED in the HUD!
The buyer did not understand what exactly this was promissory note was for. When he signed the HUD, he did not believe this promissory note he was pushed into signing the night before, was something that was necessary to finance the home.
It was not until after reviewing documents following the closing, that the buyer realized this was a portion of the seller concession.


Let me ask,
Is it legal for an individual, not a debt collector, to demand that a debt which has not been incurred yet, be paid for in advance with post-dated checks?
Is it legal for a notary to notarize a document which she knows is a part of a fraud and a document she does have an interest in happening?
__________________
Thanks,
rabo119
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-20-2008, 11:10 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by rabo119 View Post
The buyer did not understand what exactly this was promissory note was for. When he signed the HUD, he did not believe this promissory note he was pushed into signing the night before, was something that was necessary to finance the home.
It was not until after reviewing documents following the closing, that the buyer realized this was a portion of the seller concession.
It doesn't matter if it was a seller concession or condition or not. It's a monetary agreement between the buyer and seller and needs to have been reflected in the settlement.
Quote:
Let me ask,
Is it legal for an individual, not a debt collector, to demand that a debt which has not been incurred yet, be paid for in advance with post-dated checks?
Is it legal for a notary to notarize a document which she knows is a part of a fraud and a document she does have an interest in happening?
Notary's don't deal with content, just certification of the signatures.

What does a "debt collector" have to do with it. Debt collectors are actually under MORE stringement requirements not less.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-20-2008, 12:30 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,138
its legal for anyone to demand anything, i think what you are asking is if he demanded it and wasnt entitled to it could you have said no and forced him to go through with the sale, probably, but thats moot cuz you signed it.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-20-2008, 05:56 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8
Unhappy

Thank you all for your responses.


Quote:
Originally Posted by VeronicaLodge View Post
its legal for anyone to demand anything, i think what you are asking is if he demanded it and wasnt entitled to it could you have said no and forced him to go through with the sale, probably, but thats moot cuz you signed it.
I have been in contact with my attorney throughout this whole home purchase mess. I did not have a chance to tell him about the late night visit until Friday. Because of all the different reactions I have been receiving here and from others, I made an emergency appointment and saw him today. He has advised me to not say anymore about this. I'm a blabber mouth, but I'm going to try to hold to that.

I would like to say that at least for me this is an awful situation. The landlord/seller and I have know each other for about 20 years. Our families have always been close. I guess those post-dated checks were more important.

Thank you all for your responses. This has really helped me to understand this a little better.
__________________
Thanks,
rabo119
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-21-2008, 10:10 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,138
that really sucks, sorry. I know you aren't going to say anything more about it on advice of your counsel but when its all over with please come back and let us know what happened. good luck.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Find a Lawyer
Step 1:
Step 2:
 
Find a Lawyer
Post Your Case
Post your case and have it reviewed by a highly respected attorney. NO Cost, NO obligation, NO Fees! Get started now »
Get Legal Forms
Download 36,000+ forms »


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 PM.

Contact Us - FreeAdvice - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top                                        


IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.