Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Mortgages, Refinancing & Foreclosure

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2006, 01:26 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1
Unhappy

Foreclosure Drawbacks


This issue is related to a property in Melrose Park, Illinois.

I went into a Land Contract agreement for another person, let's call him Mr. P. This occurred in August of 2005 when I purchased a property on his behalf. This 2-unit property was purchased for $390,000. The terms of the agreement were that he was to pay me a $10,000 deposit and each month pay me PITI plus $200. When he was able to buy the property (he couldn't initially because of medical collections for an issue that I was told was corrected), he could do so and would have to pay me 2% of the value of the house per year. I thought it was a pretty good agreement and all went as planned for the first 3 months.

Then it turned out his wife became sick again (I think she may have actually died). Regardless, what this meant to him was that he couldn't pay me. I didn't get the full story until after I had made two full mortgage payments (approx, $3,500/month). I then came to find out that his brother, Mr. V, had been looking over the property. He had been collecting rent from the tenants in the building and not giving them to me! Mr. V also told these tenants that a new owner had bought the property and wanted them all to vacate! So now there are no tenants at this property either! At this time I found out I had to relocate out the country for a job assignment. So instead of dealing with this issue anymore, I decided to sell the prop and get rid of this headache. Turns out I bought the property overvalued. I probably would not be able to sell it at a price high enough to payoff the mortgages. It would also not be worth it to retain the property and rent it out. I further found out that I would actually need him to legally release the rights of the property to me before I could even sell it!

Well I'm considering employing the same lawyers that made the Land Contract for me to help end this nightmare. They have been telling me all the trouble and money it takes to go through all the legal issues and now I'm considering whether it's worth going through with all this. My bottom line questions are: Should I go forward with the suit, which seems prohibitive by cost and may only result in minimal amount of damages I can collect or should I just stop paying the mortgage and let the mortgage companies deal with this property by foreclosing on it? What are the repercussions to me? Will I be liable for the difference of the amount the mortgage company is able to sell the house for and their mortgage amount? Could they go after my other assets? I know this will cause credit damage, but would there be judgment or collection for the difference? Any other issues that I should be aware of?
  #2  
Old 04-21-2006, 02:07 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by hpulickal
Should I go forward with the suit, which seems prohibitive by cost and may only result in minimal amount of damages I can collect
None of us can answer that for you.

Quote:
or should I just stop paying the mortgage and let the mortgage companies deal with this property by foreclosing on it?
Again, your choice.

Quote:
What are the repercussions to me?
Not much... if you don't mind being sued and having your credit in the crapper for the next 10 years or so.

Quote:
Will I be liable for the difference of the amount the mortgage company is able to sell the house for and their mortgage amount?
Yep.

Quote:
Could they go after my other assets?
If they get a judgment against you, yes.
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.