![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Owner of my Note wants to sell note to higher % lender..What is the name of your state? CALIF. Last year my wife and I purchased a property from a desperate seller who agreed to help us make the purchase by setting up a junior-lien Note for $23,000 at Zero interest. (It got them out of a bind and got us a great deal.) Now they are in desperate need for cash and said they intend to sell the Note to someone else who will probably charge us somewhere between 4% to 6% on the very same Note. Can this even be done? Are we at the mercy of whoever they sell the Note to?.. or do they sell the Note at a discount and we continue making the same payments for the principle of $23,000? I need an answer pretty quick so I know how to respond to them. They want the whole amount now (which we dont' have) or supposedly it goes to someone else at whatever interest rate they want. (??) ![]()
__________________ -- EnricoSuave (visit my web-link sometime.. http://www.lifegoeson.net ) |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
__________________ There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution). Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport! |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
Person wants to increase Note %..Quote:
There is the amount ($23,000), the Interest Rate (Zero), the Term of Maturity (5 Years), no prepayment penalty, 90 day notice for any balloon payment, 10% charge for late payments beyond 10 days, and payment in full if the property is ever sold. That's the whole language of the Note in a nutshell. So, in principle and practice, do holders of Notes have the right to sell off a Note at a Higher interest rate than what was originally contracted for through a third party or not? I find it hard to believe they can without taking the loss themselves up front when they sell the Note at a discount.
__________________ -- EnricoSuave (visit my web-link sometime.. http://www.lifegoeson.net ) |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
Was this note recorded with the county? (i.e. as a lien or mortgage?) I would assume all parties signed it, with witnesses? (at the escrow company) I'd call the escrow company and run it past them and see what they say. I think you're safe, others may want to chime in here. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
|
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| unless your written agreement allows for terms to change then they cannot and the only hope the seller has of taking cash early is selling it at a deep discount to someone as a investor . they will learn that when they try to cash out so you might as well go dig up all the resources you can and see if they will just settle it at a discount with you. BUT YOU NEED TO SEE A ATTY to make sure this is done cleanly so it wont come back and bite you in the tush. Use the links up top and get in touch with a Real estate atty. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
[UPDATE] Owner wants to sell Note, higher %..I spoke with the Note holder today. Turns out it was his wife giving my wife a whole lot of unreliable info, probably to pressure us into paying off the loan in one lump sum. The husband said he'd probably talk to someone or a bank about them buying the loan, but as I explained to him.. that should have no effect on our interest rate since our agreement is with him at the zero-rate terms we set up through the escrow company. Turns out they started a juice-bar and want to now add a kitchen and need $20K right away. (He's leveraged out to the max.) My wife wants us to take out a 10% loan and pay them because she's friends with the Note-holder's wife. They're nice people, I like them. But after we're done paying an extra $8K+ on this loan in interest and they are making a profit on their restaurant.. where does that leave us? No, I'll stick with the original terms they agreed to and, as I told my wife, if anyone should be taking it in the shorts for the future gains on their restuarant it shouldn't be us. Thanks for the quick responses everybody!
__________________ -- EnricoSuave (visit my web-link sometime.. http://www.lifegoeson.net ) |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| 90 day notice for any balloon payment Meaning they can tell you now that in 90 days the balance? |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
mmmmmm why? Quote:
|
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| I believe that a balloon payment notice would apply to the borrower. The note, based upon my reading (I am NOT an attorney) is for a five year term with NO prepayment penalty. The borrower has the option to sell or refi BEFORE the end of the note term, and must, apparently, give 90 day notice before paying off the note. I do NOT read that this 5 year note may be called due if current payments are being made, however, the language "90 day notice for any balloon payment" is vague. FYI- the noteholder CAN sell the note, at discount, for immediate cash, but the terms cannot be changed and must be in accordance with the note language.
__________________ Adoptive parents ARE "real" parents. Sharing genes is not what makes you a "parent"! Last edited by nextwife; 12-19-2005 at 10:35 AM. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| I agree with JETX, but in general the terms of a note can not be changed even if sold. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Okay folks... we are now up to post ELEVEN... with all kinds of 'maybe, could-be, and mighta-shoulda' posts...... And the ONLY accurate one was: "Any correct answer would require a complete read of the note and its terms, which is clearly beyond the scope of this forum. I suggest you take it to a local attorney." ![]() I doubt that the FULL note only included the words provided by the OP.
__________________ There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution). Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport! Last edited by JETX; 12-19-2005 at 10:41 AM. |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| I agree with JETX. |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
Regarding the 90-Days..Quote:
"This Note is subject to Section 2966 of the Civil Code which provides that the holder of this note shall give written notice to the Trustor, or his successor in interest, of prescribed information at least 90 and not more than 150 days before any balloon payment is due." Perhaps anyone with a legal background could chime in on this. But as we understood it at time of escrow.. there is NO balloon payment described in the note, but if there had been, we were to be notified at least 90 days in advance of when it was due. The Note describes equal payments of $400/month, zero-interest with any remainder due at the end of the 5-year period.
__________________ -- EnricoSuave (visit my web-link sometime.. http://www.lifegoeson.net ) |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Please explain what else you want from us? Without the note no one can give you an answer anymore definitive! Consult an Atty in your area. |
![]() |