HOME LAW INSURANCE

Search      

Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Mortgages, Refinancing & Foreclosure
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



               


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-31-2005, 04:08 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4

Senior Exemption and Freeze


What is the name of your state? IL
We purchased a home in May 2003 with a 30 year mortgage and called the mortgage broker to see if we could afford a 15 year in March 2004. He gave us a number that was a push, but we could live with it. We rec'd a statement from the lender last month stating we were $5,717 underfunded in our escrow account. We have since learned that the broker failed to provide the escrow numbers based on assessed property taxes and rather understated them because he did not take into consideration the previous paid taxes included a senior citizen exemption and a senior freeze exemption from the previous owner.
Is the mortgage broker responsible to research actual taxes or can he simply use paid taxes from a previous year?
THANKS!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-31-2005, 04:21 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Odo of Cluny Parish
Posts: 27,482
Q: Is the mortgage broker responsible to research actual taxes or can he simply use paid taxes from a previous year?

A: My guess is that they can use last year's taxes (at least until the current year's taxes are determined). It is very difficult to find out from tax collectors the amount of taxes that are not due yet.
__________________
My signature is not working.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-31-2005, 04:25 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4

But....


IL. Is this so, even if in the previous year's taxes the taxes paid were $1,000 less than what was assessed because of the previous owner's Senior Citizen Exemption and her Senior Freeze Exemption. The accurate picture was there in the previous taxes - just up a few lines of the tax bill. Is this question clear? I know that they can't "guess" what will happen....but, it seems to me like they should review the previous year's taxes to see if any exemptions applied to the amount paid.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-31-2005, 04:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pittsburgh (North Hills)
Posts: 1,551
He should have taken the assessed value of the property times the millage rate for each of the taxing bodies to get a better estimate of the taxes due.

However, this requires a calculator and possibly a few phone calls and a little bit more time than just checking to see what was paid last year.

However, the taxes due are your responsibility.
__________________
If you're lucky enough to be Irish, you're lucky enough!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-31-2005, 04:46 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Odo of Cluny Parish
Posts: 27,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by PghREA
He should have taken the assessed value of the property times the millage rate for each of the taxing bodies to get a better estimate of the taxes due.

However, this requires a calculator and possibly a few phone calls and a little bit more time than just checking to see what was paid last year.

However, the taxes due are your responsibility.
Yes, a mistake by a third party does not relieve you of paying your bills.
__________________
My signature is not working.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-31-2005, 04:47 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4

I agree


Yes, I have paid and know that I am responsible for the taxes, whatever they are. My question is - does he have a due diligence to use that old calculator in figuring the refinancing? We would not have refinanced had the payment been calculated accurately reflecting the correct tax amount. It feels like a bait & switch....is my question clear yet?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-31-2005, 04:55 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pittsburgh (North Hills)
Posts: 1,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fergus
Yes, I have paid and know that I am responsible for the taxes, whatever they are. My question is - does he have a due diligence to use that old calculator in figuring the refinancing? We would not have refinanced had the payment been calculated accurately reflecting the correct tax amount. It feels like a bait & switch....is my question clear yet?

It is not bait and switch since YOU were the one to call the mortgage broker about a 15 yr mortgage instead of the 30 yr mortgage. The broker made a mistake in calculating the taxes - he did not purposely miscalculate the taxes to lure you into taking the 15 yr mortgage (why would he when you obviously would be paying much more in interest over a 30 yr period.)
__________________
If you're lucky enough to be Irish, you're lucky enough!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-31-2005, 04:56 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Odo of Cluny Parish
Posts: 27,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fergus
Yes, I have paid and know that I am responsible for the taxes, whatever they are. My question is - does he have a due diligence to use that old calculator in figuring the refinancing? We would not have refinanced had the payment been calculated accurately reflecting the correct tax amount. It feels like a bait & switch....is my question clear yet?
I have a low opinion of a lot of mortgage lenders and I believe every word you are saying.

But it would be a tad difficult for you to go into court and blame someone else for not figuring YOUR taxes (which you are assumed to know).

Refinance again and use a different lender.
__________________
My signature is not working.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-31-2005, 04:59 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4
Because being a broker - he doesn't benefit from the years of interest paid to a lender. But earns his fees in actually doing the refinancing. He was well aware of our cut-off point in terms of what we could afford. So, it feels as if he did not take out the calculator because we would have simply settled into the 30 year mortgage we had gotten through him in the prior year.
I do appreciate your thoughts - thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-01-2005, 03:05 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 218
Quote:
Because being a broker - he doesn't benefit from the years of interest paid to a lender. But earns his fees in actually doing the refinancing. He was well aware of our cut-off point in terms of what we could afford. So, it feels as if he did not take out the calculator because we would have simply settled into the 30 year mortgage we had gotten through him in the prior year.
You were aware of what you could afford too. You could've advocated for yourself and checked with the county on future changes to your taxes. If it were me handling your mortgage and I knew you had a maximum payment objective, I might have discussed the possibilty of future hikes in taxes so this was taken into consideration in your decision. But that's on a good day. Can't say I'd think of this every time.

It's possible he ommitted this information on purpose when going over the numbers with you in order to get you to close. The problem is trying to prove it. You also have a responsibility in this too.

If you can't afford the new payment, refinance back to a 30 year mortgage and chalk it up as a lesson learned. Next time, you'll know to investigate the taxes on your own rather than depending on someone else to do it. It's very conceivable this was an honest mistake/oversite.

BTW, whether a broker or a banker - makes no difference. Banker's don't care about how much interest will be earned either. They only care about the commission they'll receive from closing the loan. It's not like they'll receive a residual income for selling a 30 year mortgage vs 15 year. They still have a responsibilty to ensure there is a benefit to the borrower, which many mortgage people don't do.

Case in point. I just got off the phone with one of my past customers who recently discussed refinancing her mortgage with another mortgage broker that solicited her. The other mortgage broker was insistent that refinancing would be a benefit to her. I reviewed the terms of her current loan and concluded the opposite was true. My customer purchased her home 1 year ago with 2% down payment. I got her a 30 year fixed rate mortgage at 5.625%, no prepayment penalty, NO mortgage insurance. This is a special loan I can offer in my area only. Rates are higher now. Her value is not currently adequate to avoid private mortgage insurance so she'd end up with a higher rate and mortgage insurance or an option arm that would result in negative amortization. So there are a lot of predators out there. Thank God she called me first before she went ahead.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Find a Lawyer
Step 1:
Step 2:
 
Find a Lawyer
Post Your Case
Post your case and have it reviewed by a highly respected attorney. NO Cost, NO obligation, NO Fees! Get started now »
Get Legal Forms
Download 36,000+ forms »


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 PM.

Contact Us - FreeAdvice - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top                                        


IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.