Sportscourtpro
Junior Member
In california-
My grandmother has owned a 40 acre piece of property in Healdsburg since the 1930s. While there is no house on the property she has maintained it, built a building pad on it and, most importantly, maintained the road going into the property. When the winery at the base of her hill sold last year, the couple that bought it refused her access to her property. Apparently, she never set up rights to the easement. She always was granted access and never needed to establish rights. Would it still be pre-existing/nonconforming as she was here first?
What can she do to get her road access back?
Keep in mind, this land is above a winery with views to the ocean. Worth a lot of money, but if it is landlocked, it is a very cheap piece of property to everybody except...the couple that just bought t b email property with the road access. My theory is they are not granting access to my 87 y.o. grandma to later buy the property at a cheap process.
Also, the party that denied access is a lawyer and has his own firm in the city, so he has unlimited attorney resources. What would be our best approach?
My grandmother has owned a 40 acre piece of property in Healdsburg since the 1930s. While there is no house on the property she has maintained it, built a building pad on it and, most importantly, maintained the road going into the property. When the winery at the base of her hill sold last year, the couple that bought it refused her access to her property. Apparently, she never set up rights to the easement. She always was granted access and never needed to establish rights. Would it still be pre-existing/nonconforming as she was here first?
What can she do to get her road access back?
Keep in mind, this land is above a winery with views to the ocean. Worth a lot of money, but if it is landlocked, it is a very cheap piece of property to everybody except...the couple that just bought t b email property with the road access. My theory is they are not granting access to my 87 y.o. grandma to later buy the property at a cheap process.
Also, the party that denied access is a lawyer and has his own firm in the city, so he has unlimited attorney resources. What would be our best approach?