boundary
The line is moot as far as the road is concerned. There are 3 properties involved. The road to a mutual corner of 2, 40ac parcels( parcel a and B) was built in 1980. I extended that road thru my property(A) for about 1300' and in order to cross a creek the road builders infringed on adjoining parcel(B) by about 15' for about 50'. That original owner asked if he could use my 'driveway' to access his 40ac. I gave him permission for occasional use. In 1981 the group that owned all the parcels originally realized they had another 40ac parcel(C) that was landlocked. So, he got easement from me and parcel B. That new owner then extended and improved the road thru parcel B and such roads have been in use ever since. Except that owner of B was forced by me to build his own driveway in 1946 when he became a permanent resident and I took his permission away. He also was infringing on Forest land in order to gain access, so it was the forest service that forced him to build another way to access. He then tried to block me from that little section that crossed the creek and was unsuccessful. The next owner also tried to make me move road, unsuccessfully. So now this new guy, not only wants me to move road, but wants owner of C who has written easements to move off his land. He really wants to use my driveway to access his corner and I offered to give him permission, but that was not good enough. This guy is a Blank! He is one of those people who threatens to sue everybody. He thinks he can fence his 40ac parcel with no regard to our access. WE have a court date in Oct, but I think he is still bluffing. The guy is not even living on this land, and he does't plan on it for 10 years. I hope he gets hit by a truck! This all came about basically, because the title company made no mention of the easement or roads thru his property, even though this individual and the real estate broker both knew roads were in use. Well, this was more than I planned on saying here, but I hope it is interesting.