![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| US law only....
__________________ There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution). Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport! |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Forgive my ignorance, but am I missing something here? Isn't the IC3 a US organisation which works with the FBI and NW3C to combat internet crime? Doesn't that fall within the scope of US law?? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Have you visited their website? There is a large FAQ section that may answer any questions you have.
__________________ If you feel my answer is rude, mean, snarky or in anyway not to your liking, I did my job. You don't need to tell me. No private messages, I do not reply to them. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I disagree, I believe, lol, what the author of this original post was pointing out was how vast the debate spans for the case against IC3 ans it's involvement with those issues that deal only with US Law vs. those encompassing International Laws. drugs are bad ![]() |
![]() |