What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? LA
need advice concerning the following charge:
"§63.3. Entry on or remaining in places or on land after being forbidden
A. No person shall without authority go into or upon or remain in or upon or attempt to go into or upon or remain in or upon any structure, watercraft, or any other movable, or immovable property, which belongs to another, including public buildings and structures, ferries, and bridges, or any part, portion, or area thereof, after having been forbidden to do so, either orally or in writing, including by means of any sign hereinafter described, by any owner, lessee, or custodian of the property or by any other authorized person. For the purposes of this Section, the above mentioned sign means a sign or signs posted on or in the structure, watercraft, or any other movable, or immovable property, including public buildings and structures, ferries and bridges, or part, portion or area thereof, at a place or places where such sign or signs may be reasonably expected to be seen.
B. Whoever violates the provisions of this Section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined not more than five hundred dollars or imprisoned in the parish jail for not more than six months, or both.
Added by Acts 1960, No. 78, §1. Amended by Acts 1963, No. 91, §1; Acts 1968, No. 647, §1; Acts 1977, No. 445, §1; Acts 1978, No. 694, §1. "
what stipulations need to be followed concerning this law and public property? Do you need to do anything or can you just be told leave and have to comply?
Basicly was in public school having conference with princpal and asst principal concerning an incident with my son earlier that morning. When principal decided the conversation was "done"... i'm told i need to leave school property. when i asked to sign my son out, i was told i needed to get off school property. When i insisted on waiting to sign my son out of school for the day, i was arrested by the school police officer and processed into local jail on the above listed charge.
so do they need some reasonable justification for ordering me to leave, when i still had a reason to be there?
This was normal conversation in a meeting... so don't read irrate, swearing, beligerant parent here. We disagreed on whether my son had actually committed an infraction of school rules and when persistant questioning got principal to point where he could not give a reasonable answer, he called for security and was fully aware i wanted to take my son with me.
need advice concerning the following charge:
"§63.3. Entry on or remaining in places or on land after being forbidden
A. No person shall without authority go into or upon or remain in or upon or attempt to go into or upon or remain in or upon any structure, watercraft, or any other movable, or immovable property, which belongs to another, including public buildings and structures, ferries, and bridges, or any part, portion, or area thereof, after having been forbidden to do so, either orally or in writing, including by means of any sign hereinafter described, by any owner, lessee, or custodian of the property or by any other authorized person. For the purposes of this Section, the above mentioned sign means a sign or signs posted on or in the structure, watercraft, or any other movable, or immovable property, including public buildings and structures, ferries and bridges, or part, portion or area thereof, at a place or places where such sign or signs may be reasonably expected to be seen.
B. Whoever violates the provisions of this Section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined not more than five hundred dollars or imprisoned in the parish jail for not more than six months, or both.
Added by Acts 1960, No. 78, §1. Amended by Acts 1963, No. 91, §1; Acts 1968, No. 647, §1; Acts 1977, No. 445, §1; Acts 1978, No. 694, §1. "
what stipulations need to be followed concerning this law and public property? Do you need to do anything or can you just be told leave and have to comply?
Basicly was in public school having conference with princpal and asst principal concerning an incident with my son earlier that morning. When principal decided the conversation was "done"... i'm told i need to leave school property. when i asked to sign my son out, i was told i needed to get off school property. When i insisted on waiting to sign my son out of school for the day, i was arrested by the school police officer and processed into local jail on the above listed charge.
so do they need some reasonable justification for ordering me to leave, when i still had a reason to be there?
This was normal conversation in a meeting... so don't read irrate, swearing, beligerant parent here. We disagreed on whether my son had actually committed an infraction of school rules and when persistant questioning got principal to point where he could not give a reasonable answer, he called for security and was fully aware i wanted to take my son with me.