I am not fond of your implication, CdwJava, that if Aaarf16 contacts an attorney it means Aaarf16 is more interested in money than the welfare of his daughter. That is a serious mischaracterization of the role attorneys play. Attorneys are not just lawsuits and dollars. Attorneys protect the rights of their clients.
Fond or not, I am concerned that his thoughts do not appear to involve actually protecting the child only playing games ... waiting to see if the caseworker says something, contacting an attorney, etc. I do not see where he has written that he has contacted the police at all.
Look, I have seen a lot and maybe its jaded me. I have seen a great many parents who have lost custody make allegations against CPS and foster agencies in an effort to "extort" money from the system ... i.e. to profit from their child - the last abuse, so to speak. Of course, that may not be the OP's motivation at all, he may merely lack the focus to understand that nothing may get done until he says something, or, that he may be legally out of the loop. The point is, there are people who will make allegations solely to profit from the allegation and I have seen it time and time again.
The rights of the nine year old already may have been severely violated by the state if the Texas caseworker did not report the possible molestations to the police when the girl first reported them to the caseworker.
And we do not know they have not been - and the OP has not inquired or made his own report. This makes me suspect of his motivations.
While I don't argue that contacting the police would be smart, having an attorney protect the child prior to and during and after any police investigation is just as smart.
Except that if the parent had no legal rights to the child, the attorney would not, either. This is a situation where the child appears to be a ward of the court for whatever reason. if dad has supervised visits, it's because he is at least suspected of exposing the child to some harm! If the police get involved that can trigger other legal avenues such as a change of placement, a GAL, etc. Right now, we don't know anything and apparently neither does the OP. And, it is likely that he cannot legally be informed of events surrounding the child so even if something is being done, child services may not be able to tell him.
There should not be a report made to the police or a police investigation into the molestation claims made by the child without an attorney in place to advise, guide, and protect the child.
And that attorney would have to be brought in by the court if the child is a ward of the court. If the parent lacks the legal responsibility for the child, then no attorney he hires will be able to act in that child's interest ... particularly if the child was removed from custody as a result of some action or inaction by dad that led to harm or demonstrable risk of harm.