A
Arby
Guest
Oklahoma
My 14 yr old son was caught playing with matches at school. He was suspended for a week and I was blackmailed into taking him to a "first offender" program before he would be allowed to attend school again. For the record, this was just a stupid stunt on his part, he has no pyromaniacal tendancies. He was playing with matches at his desk in a classroom full of kids and a teacher, not trying to covertly burn the building down. At any rate, upon reviewing the school handbook, school board policies and talking to the Supt, there is no written provision for them to assign him to a program that is not a franchised extension of the educational system. I was informed "we have always done this when there was a criminal offense committed" The question is, was there a criminal offense committed here? I was under the impression that arson implied intent to do harm to either people or property? How come every student that lights a cigarette at school isn't treated like this? There was no intent here, just a stupid adolescent stunt.
I don't expect anybody to do research for me, but I'd appreciate it if somebody could direct me to a site where I could look up the legal definition of arson for myself.
My 14 yr old son was caught playing with matches at school. He was suspended for a week and I was blackmailed into taking him to a "first offender" program before he would be allowed to attend school again. For the record, this was just a stupid stunt on his part, he has no pyromaniacal tendancies. He was playing with matches at his desk in a classroom full of kids and a teacher, not trying to covertly burn the building down. At any rate, upon reviewing the school handbook, school board policies and talking to the Supt, there is no written provision for them to assign him to a program that is not a franchised extension of the educational system. I was informed "we have always done this when there was a criminal offense committed" The question is, was there a criminal offense committed here? I was under the impression that arson implied intent to do harm to either people or property? How come every student that lights a cigarette at school isn't treated like this? There was no intent here, just a stupid adolescent stunt.
I don't expect anybody to do research for me, but I'd appreciate it if somebody could direct me to a site where I could look up the legal definition of arson for myself.