Entrapment laws

[kwalt]

I live in Michigan. My ex husband molested our young son and was not prosecuted due to a lack of evidence. My son's young age was also a problem that caused the case to be dismissed even though during a polygraph my husband ADMITTED to touching my son inappropriately and becoming aroused. Child pornagraphy was an issue in our home, and although he admitted to downloading it there was none on the computer at the time my son's case was being investigated. Since my divorce I have had opportunities to snoop on his computer so of course I looked for something, ANYTHING to bust this nasty guy. There was only one thing I found that makes my skin crawl. I've noticed that he's talked to teenage girls. He likes to have online relationships with underage girls and I think if he felt the opportunity was there he would try and meet them in person (or maybe he has). Recently I was surfing the web and I found a vigilante site called perverted-justice. Basically what they do is have conversations with sexual predators who are out to meet minors in person. They have had some success in prosecuting these would be sexual predators. What I was wondering was if those same tactics could be appied to my ex-husband. If someone "underage" spoke to him first would this constitute entrapment and would such conversations or an attempted meeting be admissable evidence that could help lead to a possible conviction? Maybe I'm being a bit harsh, but I am a very ANGRY MOTHER. I want to see this guy get what he deserves.

 

[Crazed98]

If that site perverted-justice knows what they are doing then I would contact them if I were you.

If they start the conversation it is not entrapment only if they lead the supposed pervert into something.

For example if the "underage girl" sets up the meeting place and asks for him to have sex with her and he says yes that would be entrapment.

He would have to bring it up himself.