H
HLS
Guest
If a situation involving two people (conspiracy involving a drug case, charged on two separate complaints) there were two separate search warrants, one for each defendants home, one search was conducted before either defendant was charged, the other search warrant was obtained after defendants were charged (days later as one of the defendants was in the process of bonding out and was not home.) This second search was clearly only to gather more evidence. The lawyer for the defendants residence of the first search and seizure did not put in a motion to suppress search warrant but the lawyers for the defendance residence on the second search and seizure did put in a motion suppress, (which later was denied) is it fair to the defendant of the second search warrant that the lawyer for the defendant of the first seach didn't even try to get the court to suppress? We are asking this because the reasons the judge denied second search warrant wouldn't apply to the first one and would stand a way better chance to get thrown out. Is this fair as the evidence from the first seach warrant will be used against both defendants.