+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29
  1. #1
    arement Guest

    Angry Federal/IRS R.I.C.O.

    What is the name of your state? Texas
    Does anyone expect I will get a response, or paid?

    To Whom It May Concern:

    This is being filed against the Government of the United States and the Internal Revenue Service for failure to follow the Law of the Land, using threats, duress, coercion, fraud and deception for conversion against the Citizens in the united States
    of America.
    1. The Federal Government and the Internal Revenue Service by
    2. Fraud and Deception (acting outside of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 Territory)
    3. Requires "Citizens in the united States of America" to declare their rights null and void on the INS I-9 and W-4 forms which exhibits a
    4. Pattern of 'racketeering activity' which
    5. Participates in the Internal Revenue Service's
    6. Illegal conversion of a portion of 'Citizens in the united States of America' compensation for labor (26 CFR 9.22b-1); and
    7. Sends it across states lines to the Federal Alcohol Administration in Puerto Rico and/or Washington DC.
    20 Corpus Juris Secundum PP 1785; "the Federal Government is a foreign corporation with respect to a State." Constructive Notice of U.S.C. Title 18 Chapter 13 Sections 241 and 242 is also given.

    CONVERSION: An unauthorized assumption and exercise of the right of ownership over goods or personal chattels belonging to another, to the alteration of their condition or the exclusion of
    the owners' rights. See fraudulent conversion . . .

    FRAUDULENT CONVERSION: Receiving into possession money or property of another and fraudulently withholding, converting, or applying the same to or for one's own use and benefit,
    or to use and benefit of any person other than the one to whom the money or property belongs.

    U.S. CRIMINAL CODE TITLE 18, CHAPTER 13 SECTIONS 241 & 242 make it a FELONY to use or conspire to use COLOR OF LAW to enforce a Code or Regulation which results in the violation of a persons' Rights. Violaters will be prosecuted. [Exact law reproduced below]

    Section 241: Conspiracy Against Rights of Citizens
    If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution
    or laws of the united States of America, or because of his having exercised same; or

    If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured -
    They shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both; and if death results, they shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.

    Section 242: Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
    Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant of any State, Territory, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the united States of America, or to different punishments, pains or penalties, on account of such inhabitant being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined not
    more that $1000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if death results, shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.

    [$10,000.00 fine and treble damages = $30,000.00 fine] TIMES all people "elected, appointed and hired by the US Government" for allowing it and the Internal Revenue Service for imposing the
    fraud on the several States united in America]

    Immediately remit to:
  2. #2
    racer72 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    14,137
    WACKO ALERT WACKO ALERT!!!!!!!!
  3. #3
    loocpoc Guest
    Nope. It will be dismissed without prejudice. You can not sue the US government. Ever hear of Immunity of the Soverienty?
  4. #4
    arement Guest
    Oops, you may be uninformed, racer72:

    The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (Title 28 USC 1602-1611); "any government agency (federal, state, or local) and the administrators and agents of such agencies will lose all sovereign immunity when engaged in commerce, regardless of the Citizenship of the plaintiff."

    I also have a Complaint for Damages from Constitutional Violations and a Brief in Support thereof:

    A Declaratory Judgement that the actions of the federal Government, the federal President, the federal Congress and the federal Judiciary acting in concert with the Treasury, DOJ and FRB constitute an unlawful usurpation of the Constitution for the united States of America, for the purpose(s) of implementing exclusive Legislation, in all cases whatsoever (Statutory Jurisdiction) over the Plaintiff, to the detriment of lawful money in these united States of America and for Treason, high Crimes and Misdemeanors (Article II Section 4 and Article III Section 3);

    I don't disagree they are ignored, AND we can't seem to get redress of grievances, either!

    We might as well STOP calling this place "America" - it's more like:
    United Socialist States of AmeriKa !!! [USSA]
  5. #5
    hexeliebe Guest
    I need a new drug
  6. #6
    loocpoc Guest
    "The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (Title 28 USC 1602-1611); "any government agency (federal, state, or local) and the administrators and agents of such agencies will lose all sovereign immunity when engaged in commerce, regardless of the Citizenship of the plaintiff."

    You really are some sort of assclown. I hate to tell you but Title 28 USC 1602-1611 deals with Foreign heads of state being brought to court in the US and our elected and appointed officials being brought to court in a foreign nation. More so it deals with them being free from the threat of execution and from being sued while preforming their OFFICIAL DUTIES.

    "A Declaratory Judgement that the actions of the federal Government, the federal President, the federal Congress and the federal Judiciary acting in concert with the Treasury, DOJ and FRB constitute an unlawful usurpation of the Constitution for the united States of America, for the purpose(s) of implementing exclusive Legislation, in all cases whatsoever (Statutory Jurisdiction) over the Plaintiff, to the detriment of lawful money in these united States of America and for Treason, high Crimes and Misdemeanors (Article II Section 4 and Article III Section 3)"

    What militia are you apart of? Let me guess, lets make Tex ass a country again milita? Dude you need some help.
  7. #7
    arement Guest

    Angry

    The several States united in America need the help !!!

    The federal Government is a foreign corporation with respect to a State - 20 Corpus Juris Secundum PP 1785 !!!

    Official Duties do NOT include fraud, threats, duress, coercion, intimidation, extortion, crimes of omission OR misprision of felony.

    YOU, sir, have violated the policy of this forum: be civil.

    U.S. Supreme Court

    HAFER v. MELO, 502 U.S. 21 (1991)

    502 U.S. 21

    BARBARA HAFER, PETITIONER v. JAMES C. MELO, JR.,
    ET AL.
    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
    APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

    No. 90-681

    Argued October 15, 1991
    Decided November 5, 1991

    Washington, D.C. - State officials who deprive citizens of their constitutional rights may be forced to pay compensation out of their own pockets, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.

    The court's 8-0 decision assures that injured citizens may seek such compensation from state officials even though the citizens are legally barred from suing the governments that employ them.

    So, if you name names, they CAN be sued in their individual capacities !!!
  8. #8
    hexeliebe Guest
    YOU, sir, have violated the policy of this forum: be civil.
    And you sir, are a flaming idiot!!!

    So put that in you smoke and pipe it.
  9. #9
    arement Guest

    Angry

    Now loocpoc AND hexeliebe are BOTH being un-civil.

    Apparently there is no moderator.

    Sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me!

    Y'all are either part of the New World ODOR, or stupid as *hit !!!

    I want to hear from someone who knows whereof they speak.

    Try this:

    The People have knowledge that there are two distinct classes of Citizenship -- one retaining all birthrights, of a separate and equal station, being of Private status and Freeman Character and the other is a subject of and subordinate to the laws of the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al, and one of its subdivisions, known as the STATE OF TEXAS et al.

    The New Deal Democracy, having amended the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 in 1933 with the intent to include the people of the united States of America as enemies of the Federal Government, has imposed War and Emergency Power upon the American People. Public officials perjure themselves as to their constitutional oath and pledge their allegiance to private corporations, known as the District of Columbia (United States), and the Federal Reserve, (the bank and the fund), their Principals and Agents. The STATE OF TEXAS cannot act in a de jure capacity due to its having pledged its sovereignty and all the assets of the people of the STATE to the federal government for the unrevealed benefits of the Socialist New Deal Democracy, Public Trust, of the District of Columbia incorporated by Act of Congress in 1876 and its subdivisions in 1933 and many times thereafter.

    The Courts of United States et al and the STATE OF TEXAS have left the constraints and restrictions of their Constitutional bounds by operating Admiralty/Maritime tribunals under the so called "Emergency" rather than "Courts of Law, Equity and Admiralty" as stated in our national Constitution. FRCP 2 which combines Law, Equity and Admiralty into one action called "Civil Action" being administered by said tribunals under Admiralty/Maritime jurisdiction has totally removed from the people their remedies in Law and/or Equity with specific intent of making unlawful seizures, judgments, decrees and orders against the people for the purpose of taking of Private land, Private property and the God given and Constitutionally protected rights of the people. It is clear that the legislatively created courts of our land are operating under what is intended to be secret jurisdiction and secret law known only to the attorneys and judges. Replacing the "law of the land" with the "law of the sea", is clearly unlawful as purviewed by the contract between the people and the government, that contract being the Constitution for the united States of America.

    The Courts of the United States et al and the STATE OF TEXAS have used their forcible entry, unlawful detainer, libel and slander, to deny the de jure People Due Process of Law, keeping the truth and knowledge of the Supreme Law of the Land (Constitution for the united States of America; Bill of Rights) from the People and the knowledge of what they have really given up insofar as their God-given rights and liberty versus their so-called government granted privileges and liberties and further have withheld evidence in order to support and defend their unlawful allegiance to the corporate U.S. of the District of Columbia.

    The Courts of the United States et al and the STATE OF TEXAS have perpetrated a fraud upon the American People by using "secret law" and "secret jurisdiction". Said courts are a fiction at law and they bring the de jure people into their "secret jurisdiction" by attempting to make a natural person into a fiction at law by fictitious pleadings (i.e. putting their name in all capital letters and designating them as a "legally created entity") while withholding the knowledge that a Private individual is not bound by fictitious pleadings.

    The representative government and the appellate courts, are holding the American People under the presumption that an agreement that only requires offer and acceptance is a contract, but in Law it is not a contract. For a bona fide contract to be binding, it requires offer, acceptance and lawful consideration. There basically has been no lawful consideration since 1933 to bind a contract, due to the bankruptcy of the United States and because Federal Reserve Bank Notes are obligations, not assets.

    Finally, it is imperative to realize that the authority and powers of both the federal and state governments were delegated by the people. The People did not give up their authority and power, they merely delegated some aspects of it to the respective governments and retained what was not delegated (see Amendments 9 & 10 of our national Constitution). The People did not delegate to the governments the power to violate their substantive, God given, rights. To the contrary, the Bill of Rights specifically enumerates some of those rights so that the state and federal governments would know that they could not tread upon them. Yet, even those spelled out are being violated every day. More importantly, the People's right to the Common Law is specifically retained and protected by the Constitution for the united States of America.
  10. #10
    stephenk is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    california
    Posts
    7,790
    I am intrigued.

    So get to the bottom line. What do you want? Dismantle the US government? Each state is a sovereign entity? No states?

    Who will run the infrastructure of the US? Dont say the people, because that is not truly answering the question.
  11. #11
    hexeliebe Guest


    You haven't seen uncivil yet.

    How is, "YOU Sir are a piece of $hit!"

    Now that's uncivil.
  12. #12
    arement Guest

    Thumbs up

    Thank you, stephenk!

    Look at it this way: we flush our toilets, wash our dishes and clothes when they get dirty, mop up spills, alarm our houses to keep burglars out and fence our animals in, right?

    Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 in the Constitution for the united States of America defines a limited territory for "exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever" . . . the US Government can tell itself "whatever" - how to operate.

    OUTSIDE that territory (10 miles square AND purchased/ceded territory upon approval of States Legislatures) there is only supposed to be law: Constitution, Bill of Rights, lawfully approved amendments/treaties and International Law !!!

    Look carefully at what I just said; "lawfully approved" . . .
    amendments are to be in accordance with Article 5 ONLY.
    Treaties require approval of 2/3 national Senate and the sign of a national President.

    Since at least 1863 (Lieber Codes - Lincoln's Proclamation 100) and especially 1933 (FDR's Emergency and War Powers) Congress was reduced to resolution only - federal, NOT national.

    Each President has retained and re-declared the E/W Powers - federal, NOT national. Therefore there have been NO "lawfully approved" amendments OR treaties !!!

    So, let us, the free, independent sovereigns on the land in our counties in one (each) of the several States united in America "mop up" the spillage (exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever) OUTSIDE the limited territory and return it to its proper place.

    There are two duties OF the elected: federal and national.
    The "national" was put to sleep by the E/W Powers !!!

    Executive Odors are applicable to ONLY federal territory AND those who volunteer for US citizen-subject status: assumed benefits = compelled performance.

    Article 1.14b in the Texas Criminal Law and Motor Vehicle Handbook says; "failure to object to defects in process, denies the right to object at a later date."

    I object early and often !!!
  13. #13
    DogToenails Guest
    Oh, looky looky what we have here!!! One of those blowhards that think they're smarter than the rest of us. Listen gasbag, don't you think other wackos before you have tried this already? "I refuse to pay taxes", " I refuse to put a license plate on the car", yeah yeah yeah Blah, Blah, Blah!!! Why don't you save your nonsense for the pilots of the black helicopters as they're fine tuning the tracking beacons on top of the light poles on the interstate cloverleafs. The irony is that since you are a citizen of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA, you can't be shot for your senseless drivel. LMFAO!!! Just shaddap and pay your taxes ya ma-ROON!!!
  14. #14
    arement Guest

    Red face

    Nope, DogToeNails - I have just read and understood more!

    Think for a minute, it's a nice change of pace.

    Besides, I am NOT addressing those who care not to know!

    None are so blind as those who will not see . . .

    We can't get out of the stew we're in, until we get out of the stew.

    You can't object to defects in process unless you know due process.

    Don't believe me when I say we are under New World ODOR control and subject to Executive ODORS?

    Read these: (just a few to give you a taste)!

    Revelations From Great And Powerful Men

    PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE
    THESE QUOTES EVERYWHERE!
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    "We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money."

    Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.,
    in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995)
    ------
    THAT quotation and the following - and many others like them - clearly demonstrate that the words "new world order" are deadly serious and furthermore, have been in use for decades. They did not originate with President George Bush in 1990. The "old world order" is one based on independent nation-states. The "new world order" involves the elimination of the sovereignty and independence of nation-states and some form of world government. This means the end of the United States of America, the U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights as we now know
    them. Most of the new world order proposals involve the conversion of the United Nations and its agencies to a world government, complete with a world army, a world parliament, a world court, global taxation, and numerous other agencies to control every aspect of human life (education, nutrition, health care, population, immigration, communications, transportation, commerce, agriculture, finance, the environment, etc.). The various notions of the "new world order" differ as to details and scale, but agree on the basic principle and substance.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    "Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an "extraterrestrial" invasion], whether real or *promulgated* [emphasis mine], that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this *scenario*, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."

    Dr. Henry Kissinger,
    Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
    -----------
    "The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."

    Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets
    ------------
    "We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."

    David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission,
    in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission,
    in June, 1991.
    -----------
    "The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those two so-called ideologies [marxism/fascism/socialism v. democracy/capitalism] to enable them [the Illuminati] to divide larger and larger portions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other."

    Myron Fagan
    ----------
    "No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter
    the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation."

    David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative,
    United Nations
    ---------
    "In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press....They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers.

    "An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers."

    U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, 1917
    ---------
    "The world can therefore seize the opportunity [Persian Gulf crisis] to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind."

    George Herbert Walker Bush
    ---------
    "In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all."

    Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.
    ----------
    "We shall have world government whether or not you
    like it, by conquest or consent."

    Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, l950
    ----------
    "The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."

    Benjamin Disraeli, first Prime Minister of England, in a novel he published in 1844 called Coningsby, the New Generation
    ----------
    "The governments of the present day have to deal not merely with other governments, with emperors, kings and ministers, but also with the secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, and can at the last moment upset all the governments' plans. "

    British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, 1876
    ----------
    "Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."

    Woodrow Wilson,The New Freedom (1913)
    ---------
    "What is important is to dwell upon the increasing evidence of the existence of a secret conspiracy, throughout the world, for the destruction of organized government and
    the letting loose of evil."

    Christian Science Monitor editorial, June 19th, l920
    ------------
    "The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen....At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties."

    Want more?
  15. #15
    arement Guest

    Exclamation

    Ask and ye shall receive:

    "From the days of Sparticus, Wieskhopf, Karl Marx, Trotsky, Rosa Luxemberg, and Emma Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire."

    Winston Churchill, stated to the London Press, in l922.
    -----------
    "We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world."

    Professor Arnold Toynbee, in a June l931 speech before
    the Institute for the Study of International Affairs in Copenhagen.
    ------------
    "The government of the Western nations, whether monarchical or republican, had passed into the invisible hands of a plutocracy, international in power and grasp. It was, I venture to suggest, this semioccult power which....pushed the mass of the American people into the cauldron of World War I."

    British military historian MajorGeneral J.F.C. Fuller, l941
    -----------
    "For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn't. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared "ammunition" in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid
    off and returned his internationalist political support.

    "The UN is but a long-range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power.

    "The depression was the calculated 'shearing' of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market....The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank."

    Curtis Dall, FDR's son-in-law as quoted in his book,
    My Exploited Father-in-Law
    ---------
    "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."

    A letter written by FDR to Colonel House,
    November 21st, l933
    ----------
    "The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and
    exercise power from behind the scenes."

    Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, 1952
    -----------
    "Fifty men have run America, and that's a high figure."

    Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, l936
    issue of The New York Times.
    ----------
    "Today the path of total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people. Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government - a bureaucratic elite."

    Senator William Jenner, 1954
    -----------
    "The case for government by elites is irrefutable"

    Senator William Fulbright, Former chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, stated at a 1963 symposium entitled: The Elite and the Electorate - Is Government by the People Possible?
    -----------
    "The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for
    multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends
    is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nationstates involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future."

    U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater in his l964 book:
    With No Apologies.

Similar Threads

  1. Federal law
    By magaskins in forum Other Crimes Federal and State
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-24-2011, 09:16 AM
  2. Can the Federal Government seize funds in IRA and 401ks to collect nontax federal de
    By lottopol in forum Other Government & Administrative Law Matters
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-02-2010, 03:29 PM
  3. State2State Extradition on Federal Charge Federal or State Extradition Law Applies?
    By Kai in forum Arrests, Searches, Warrants & Procedure
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-25-2007, 04:23 AM
  4. Federal Civil Action/Federal Tort Claim
    By Angriff in forum Dangerous or Defective Products
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-12-2003, 10:33 AM
  5. Something Federal Judges & Federal Prosecutors should read!!
    By Johnny Wizard in forum US Supreme Court & The Constitution
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-21-2002, 12:19 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

© 1995-2012 Advice Company, All Rights Reserved

FreeAdvice® has been providing millions of consumers with outstanding advice, free, since 1995. While not a substitute for personal advice from a licensed professional, it is available AS IS, subject to our Disclaimer and Terms & Conditions Of Use.