Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Other Personal Injury and Wrongful Death : Airplane Accidents, Boating Accidents, Slips, Falls, etc.
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > ACCIDENT AND INJURY LAW > Other Personal Injury and Wrongful Death

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-02-2005, 03:36 AM
ckl ckl is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3
Exclamation

Hair Damage/Breakage from Chemical Treatment [HELP!]


What is the name of your state? California

My girlfriend recently had her hair straightened at a local salon using a japanese process called "Yuko" Thermal Reconditioning. A day later, her hair started breaking at the scalp, leaving her with quarter-sized patches of fuzz where the the roots of the hair remain. These patches of hair feel like day-old beard growth, very rough and short.

She immediately returned to the salon the following day, where the person who had worked on her hair washed off the chemical treatment, and gave her some take-home treatments. My girlfriend's hair, however, did not improve, and continued to break off even more, especially after applying the "treatment", which looked like hair gel.

Four days after the treatment, her hair looks really bad. There are patches of hair missing from her scalp, and the remaining hair are all "bent" at the scalp, a result, we learned later, of placing the chemical to close to the scalp. These hairs feel very brittle, do not completely cover the bald spots, and seem to be in danger of falling out. We have an appointment with another salon tomorrow, with a nationally recognized specialist, who will attempt to salvage her remaining hair.

Searching on the internet, we found that she is not the only one with this problem. 20/20 did a report on this a while back. It seems as if stylists are attempting to use the Yuko system without being completely competent. The stylist is supposed to consult with the person getting the treatment, and test the resiliency of the hair, which our stylist did not do. In addition, the chemical used cannot be placed on the scalp, nor left on the hair for too long, both which the stylist did.

We are planning on writing a demand letter to the salon, asking for the following:

$250 for Refund of straightening process
$350-$1300 for Treatement/Restoration by Different Salon
????? for any additional treatment needed for next 2 years or until hair is fully recovered
????? for possible hairpiece she may have to wear
????? for embarassment, pain and suffering, stress

As a last resort, we plan on suing the salon, most likely in small claims court (CA has a $5,000 limit).

My questions are:
1) How much should we ask for pain and suffering? We would like to keep it under the $5,000 statutory limit so that we won't need to hire a lawyer.

2) How should the pain and suffering be categorized and calculated? I've heard that it's usually 2-4 times treatment costs.

3) Should we be asking for more/less money?

4) Is this a feasible case?

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for taking the time out to read this!

Last edited by ckl; 08-02-2005 at 04:43 AM.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.