Q
qismom
Guest
(Sorry for the long letter but please read!!! I need quick advice)
In May 2000 I contacted my rental office to get information on my options for vacating their property by the July 31 end of lease date.I was told to give 60 days notice but if my other plans did not go through they might be able to give me a 1-2 month extension or I could go on a month-to-month lease for an additional $40.00.
Here is my letter dated May 31, 2000.:
"This letter servers as 60-day notice of my intent to vacate the proerty,"(address)"at the end of my lease (July 31, 2000). If at the end of these 60 days, my other arrangements have not become available, I would like to request a one-month extension, if possible. If not possible, I would like to enter into a month-to-month agreement for the month of August. I understand that I would have to give 30-days notice by August 1, 2000 of my intent to vacate at the end of August." ...
After contacting the rental office last week and informing them that my plans didn't go through and I wanted to enter into the month-to-month lease, I was told to write my request on the bottom of my rental renewal letter and bring it in to the office. I did that and turned the letter in on July 26,2000. I was called on July 27 and told that I had to vacate the property by July 31, because it had been rented out. When I asked why, they told me that I had already given my 60 days notice. When I reminded this person that she was the one that told me that I could enter into a month-to-month if my plans fell through. Although she remembered she said 'that's if they have not leased the property already. She never informed me of that. She also said I should have informed them earlier of my intent. I asked her when a reasonable time would have been and she said (paraphrase)Well if you had let us know a week later then we would have taken you unit off of the market. We put it up for lease soon after we got your 60 day notice. Is it reasonable for me to have told her earlier if I didn't know that my plans were not going to go through. It was my understanding that I had until the end of my lease (according to my letter) to let them know. They said that my letter was confusing. It may be confusing but shouldn't they have called me for clarification and/or let me know earlier that they were renting the apartment and find out where I stood with my plans. I'm so confused. Now they tell me I have to be out by July 31 (today is July 29) because they have a tenant coming in on August 15 and they have no other units to rent him or to put me in.
What recourse do I have since there is no way for me to move in a weekend with no where to go. Also can they evict me by July 31. I intend to move by the end of August but that's the earliest I can do. What are there obligations to me since they left some confusion in my mind and didn't tell exactly when I was supposed to let them know that I wanted to stay and go on the month-to-month lease.
[This message has been edited by qismom (edited July 28, 2000).]
[This message has been edited by qismom (edited July 28, 2000).]
In May 2000 I contacted my rental office to get information on my options for vacating their property by the July 31 end of lease date.I was told to give 60 days notice but if my other plans did not go through they might be able to give me a 1-2 month extension or I could go on a month-to-month lease for an additional $40.00.
Here is my letter dated May 31, 2000.:
"This letter servers as 60-day notice of my intent to vacate the proerty,"(address)"at the end of my lease (July 31, 2000). If at the end of these 60 days, my other arrangements have not become available, I would like to request a one-month extension, if possible. If not possible, I would like to enter into a month-to-month agreement for the month of August. I understand that I would have to give 30-days notice by August 1, 2000 of my intent to vacate at the end of August." ...
After contacting the rental office last week and informing them that my plans didn't go through and I wanted to enter into the month-to-month lease, I was told to write my request on the bottom of my rental renewal letter and bring it in to the office. I did that and turned the letter in on July 26,2000. I was called on July 27 and told that I had to vacate the property by July 31, because it had been rented out. When I asked why, they told me that I had already given my 60 days notice. When I reminded this person that she was the one that told me that I could enter into a month-to-month if my plans fell through. Although she remembered she said 'that's if they have not leased the property already. She never informed me of that. She also said I should have informed them earlier of my intent. I asked her when a reasonable time would have been and she said (paraphrase)Well if you had let us know a week later then we would have taken you unit off of the market. We put it up for lease soon after we got your 60 day notice. Is it reasonable for me to have told her earlier if I didn't know that my plans were not going to go through. It was my understanding that I had until the end of my lease (according to my letter) to let them know. They said that my letter was confusing. It may be confusing but shouldn't they have called me for clarification and/or let me know earlier that they were renting the apartment and find out where I stood with my plans. I'm so confused. Now they tell me I have to be out by July 31 (today is July 29) because they have a tenant coming in on August 15 and they have no other units to rent him or to put me in.
What recourse do I have since there is no way for me to move in a weekend with no where to go. Also can they evict me by July 31. I intend to move by the end of August but that's the earliest I can do. What are there obligations to me since they left some confusion in my mind and didn't tell exactly when I was supposed to let them know that I wanted to stay and go on the month-to-month lease.
[This message has been edited by qismom (edited July 28, 2000).]
[This message has been edited by qismom (edited July 28, 2000).]