Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Other Real Estate Law Questions

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-14-2006, 05:06 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14
Question

HOA banning rent/lease of homes


What is the name of your state? Michigan

Is it legal for a HOA to ban the rent or leasing of homes in the community? The reason they give, lower property values, seem to be very legally weak if challenged in court, with the assumption that renting/leasing a home brings in a lower class of people.
  #2  
Old 12-14-2006, 05:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: snowland
Posts: 6,836
If you already own a home that has covenants written and in place when you bought it and the issue was not addressed at the time you bought it then its likely that they cannot add it in afterwards. SO your best bet is to use the links up top to locate a real estate atty and have her/him review all the documents pertaining to the home and restrictions in place at the time it was purchased . This way the atty can give you a opinion as to wether they can indeed impose any new restrictions. If you learn that no changes can be made by them then feel free to tell them they are full of bovine excrement.
  #3  
Old 12-14-2006, 05:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by FarmerJ View Post
If you already own a home that has covenants written and in place when you bought it and the issue was not addressed at the time you bought it then its likely that they cannot add it in afterwards. SO your best bet is to use the links up top to locate a real estate atty and have her/him review all the documents pertaining to the home and restrictions in place at the time it was purchased . This way the atty can give you a opinion as to wether they can indeed impose any new restrictions. If you learn that no changes can be made by them then feel free to tell them they are full of bovine excrement.
I handled the sales by a municipality of two entire subdivisions of excess school district land. It was REQUIRED that all buyers occupy within one year of purchase. THe idea being, not a class issue, but that homeowners are vested in the neighborhood they live in, and more inclined (theoretically) to care about the well-being of the neighborhood/the schools, and the home, than renters, who can relocate with far less problem,.

If there is a E&R limiting non-owner occupancy, it IS legal!
__________________
Adoptive parents ARE "real" parents. Sharing genes is not what makes you a "parent"!
  #4  
Old 12-14-2006, 06:18 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14
Thank you for the replies, I should have mentioned that the current CCRs allow rent/leasing of homes and the board wishes the homeowners to vote upon this issue at the next HOA meeting, I just wanted to be able to correctly defend my opposition to this proposal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nextwife View Post
The idea being, not a class issue, but that homeowners are vested in the neighborhood they live in, and more inclined (theoretically) to care about the well-being of the neighborhood/the schools, and the home, than renters, who can relocate with far less problem.
I had the same thoughts as you and agree in principle, but I can drive through my neighborhood and point a finger at many homeowners that have been less inclined to care for the well-being of their homes. I have a problem with social-economic classifications of people and grouping a renter into sub-class of people is not justifiable (I understand your description is not class based Nextwife), but others not always think that way and the people asking for the vote are thinking social-economically. The HOA has gotten into legal trouble in the past for questionable rule additions and I just want to understand if this can become another legal land mine for the association.
  #5  
Old 12-14-2006, 08:21 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 370
If all the owners agree, then yes it can be done.

If not unanimous, can you force an existing homeowner with following this new rule? I doubt it...to be able to rent is a valuable property right. Better to have existing homes grandfathered so it is phased in over time...that will at least stop the bleeding and begin a reversal.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.