Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Other Real Estate Law Questions

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-14-2001, 06:44 AM
Hairy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

Overhanging branches


I live in the state of Indiana. My neighbor's trees' branches hang way beyond the property line over onto our yard. Hedge apples (heavy, round green bumpy seeds about the size of grapefruits) grow on most of these trees and fall on our side. They litter our yard and if they fall on someone, they could cause serious harm. Also, the branches overhang our wires, and in the past have damaged our antenna because some the branches overhang the roof of our house as well. The neighbors have a friend who works for the city and who they call out whenever my husband trims those branches. They insist that we cannot touch the branches of their trees that hang onto our side. Is this true?

Last edited by Hairy; 08-14-2001 at 06:46 AM.
  #2  
Old 08-14-2001, 10:49 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,507
No, it is not true. You can REASONABLY trim the branches that overhang your property line.

I would suggest that you talk with your neighbor and discuss the problem. Ask him to arrange for a treecutter to trim the branches on your property. If he refuses, tell him that you will have it done yourself (at your cost) but you wanted to give him an opportunity to be in control of what was done.

Then, go ahead and trim away. However, it must ONLY be a trim of branches on your side. If you get overly aggressive and damage HIS tree on his side, he could have a cause of action against you. That is another reason why it would be good for you to have an expert do the trimming.
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.