Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Other Real Estate Law Questions

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-24-2006, 03:26 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5
Exclamation

Same problem, more detailed question....


What is the name of your state? Michigan

Here's my situation. When my house was purchased in 2002, I wasn't made aware that the sewer lines were connected. The following winter, I started having problems with the sewage backing up, and so did the neighboring house. The neighbors then informed me that this was a frequent occurence because the lines were connected. These people were tennents, and the owner of their house is the woman that I purchased my house from (she owned them both and rented them out, before selling this house to me). At the time I bought my house, the seller was aware that the lines are connected and also that there were problems in the past, but this information was never disclosed to me before the time of sale. She still owns the other house (her son now lives there), and I am again having sewer problems that are now more serious. So, am I liable for the cost to but in new lines, since the other homeowner and previous owner of my home was aware of the situation but never disclosed the information before the sale of my home? I hope I'm making sense here!
  #2  
Old 01-24-2006, 04:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Odo of Cluny Parish
Posts: 29,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by nights_child
What is the name of your state? Michigan

Here's my situation. When my house was purchased in 2002, I wasn't made aware that the sewer lines were connected. The following winter, I started having problems with the sewage backing up, and so did the neighboring house. The neighbors then informed me that this was a frequent occurence because the lines were connected. These people were tennents, and the owner of their house is the woman that I purchased my house from (she owned them both and rented them out, before selling this house to me). At the time I bought my house, the seller was aware that the lines are connected and also that there were problems in the past, but this information was never disclosed to me before the time of sale. She still owns the other house (her son now lives there), and I am again having sewer problems that are now more serious. So, am I liable for the cost to but in new lines, since the other homeowner and previous owner of my home was aware of the situation but never disclosed the information before the sale of my home? I hope I'm making sense here!

No, you are not making the least bit of sense.

How is having sewer lines connected harmful?
__________________
There are two rules for success:

(1) Never tell everything you know.
  #3  
Old 01-24-2006, 04:17 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: I don't know. The guys with the keys won't say. I think it's top secret info.
Posts: 10,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by seniorjudge
No, you are not making the least bit of sense.

How is having sewer lines connected harmful?
SJ: I believe the OP is concerned about a non disclosed defect when they purchased the property. In the other post they had they asked about interconnected sewer lines.

They are having problems and want to know if they have any recourse due to it being a pre-existing undisclosed defect.

At least that is my take on it.
  #4  
Old 01-24-2006, 04:20 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5
Unhappy

that's right justalayman


and connected sewer lines is "harmful" because it is now ILLEGAL. Please see my other post for more information!!
  #5  
Old 01-24-2006, 04:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Odo of Cluny Parish
Posts: 29,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by nights_child
and connected sewer lines is "harmful" because it is now ILLEGAL. Please see my other post for more information!!
Sorry...I never was good at connect the dots.
__________________
There are two rules for success:

(1) Never tell everything you know.
  #6  
Old 01-24-2006, 09:21 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: snowland
Posts: 6,824
So when you contacted your city to learn exactly when it is that you must make a new connection to the sewer main did you by chance ask them if they have any programs in place to fund such repairs? such as paying the cost and adding it as a special to your property taxes over a set amount of time? it doesnt hurt to ask. AS far as disclosure to you your going to have to speak to a real estate atty to learn what your options may be. If you ever buy a older home again go to your public works desk and check the tap card records to see that each home on each side of you has a tap card listed to it. so you know for sure there is no shared water or sewer taps.
  #7  
Old 01-24-2006, 11:57 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
good ideas.
  #8  
Old 01-26-2006, 03:18 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5

I never contacted the city


I don't intend to change anything unless I have to, which is why I need to know who is responsible for the bill. I feel that the other owner should pay, because she knew about the connection and the history of problems and never told me, plus she's loaded and can afford to pay, and I can't, lol!
  #9  
Old 01-26-2006, 03:21 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 10,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by seniorjudge
No, you are not making the least bit of sense.

How is having sewer lines connected harmful?
Thank God. I was not the only one "Spell Bound".
__________________
It is our unanimous opinion that you are damn right and it should be obvious to any moron that your (ex) (SO’s ex) (boss) (landlord) (local police) should be immediately (jailed) (fired) (reprimanded) (arrested) (demoted) (shot) (evicted).
In fact, you are so astonishingly correct in this matter, it will not surprise us one bit if you are offered a generous settlement, because, by golly, that’s just how it should be.

You Rock,
Love,
Us
  #10  
Old 01-26-2006, 09:01 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by --PARIDISE--
Thank God. I was not the only one "Spell Bound".

**A: is part of the witches brew.

signed,

Voodoo Inc.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.