California,
I will try to make this simple. Last year we sold our home. Prior to close an inspection was done and several minor repairs were noted and fixed by us. Another request from the buyer was that our pool equipment be inspected by a reputable company and that we repair anything that needs fixing. We did that as well. Unknown to us the owners moved into our house 4 days prior to the close of escrow. they opened us up to a potential lawsuit by doing so because it was still in our name, they had a cable guy on our roof and a toddler in the house with an uncovered pool. Fortunately nothing happened. By moving in early their was never a final walk through. 3 weeks after escrow closed they emailed us and said that the pool was leaking, the light didn't work and that it was going to cost 6,500 dollars in repairs. Of course we refused , but now a year later they are back again and asking for the 6,500 still or they will sue us. Do they have any ground to stand on. It is my understanding that homes in California are sold "as-is", and that by foregoing the walk through and waiting 3 weeks, and the fact that the inspector didn't note any problems with the pool, that they are out of luck. What do you think ?
Thanks for your help What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
I will try to make this simple. Last year we sold our home. Prior to close an inspection was done and several minor repairs were noted and fixed by us. Another request from the buyer was that our pool equipment be inspected by a reputable company and that we repair anything that needs fixing. We did that as well. Unknown to us the owners moved into our house 4 days prior to the close of escrow. they opened us up to a potential lawsuit by doing so because it was still in our name, they had a cable guy on our roof and a toddler in the house with an uncovered pool. Fortunately nothing happened. By moving in early their was never a final walk through. 3 weeks after escrow closed they emailed us and said that the pool was leaking, the light didn't work and that it was going to cost 6,500 dollars in repairs. Of course we refused , but now a year later they are back again and asking for the 6,500 still or they will sue us. Do they have any ground to stand on. It is my understanding that homes in California are sold "as-is", and that by foregoing the walk through and waiting 3 weeks, and the fact that the inspector didn't note any problems with the pool, that they are out of luck. What do you think ?
Thanks for your help What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?