AgentSmithers
Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California
A few days ago I received this violation for having my car parked outside my wife's work. I am use to having to sign a slip by a peace officer and having them mark it as correctable per 40303.5.
But this violation was issues by a City Code Compliance Officer? I had no interaction with him at all. They just mailed this slip to me?
So does that mean this is not correctable considering I never got arrested/detained? I was also not the one who was driving the car she was. I'm use to the citation being written to the person driving the car instead of the person who owns it. I just wanted to see what everyone thinks the best option is to go about this?
Thanks!
A few days ago I received this violation for having my car parked outside my wife's work. I am use to having to sign a slip by a peace officer and having them mark it as correctable per 40303.5.
But this violation was issues by a City Code Compliance Officer? I had no interaction with him at all. They just mailed this slip to me?
So does that mean this is not correctable considering I never got arrested/detained? I was also not the one who was driving the car she was. I'm use to the citation being written to the person driving the car instead of the person who owns it. I just wanted to see what everyone thinks the best option is to go about this?
Thanks!
4000.
(a) (1) No person shall drive, move, or leave standing upon a highway, or in an offstreet public parking facility, any motor vehicle, trailer, semitrailer, pole or pipe dolly, or logging dolly, unless it is registered and the appropriate fees have been paid under this code or registered under the permanent trailer identification program, except that an off-highway motor vehicle which displays an identification plate or device issued by the department pursuant to Section 38010 may be driven, moved, or left standing in an offstreet public parking facility without being registered or paying registration fees.
Assuming this is your first violation (or even your second) for this same offense and assuming that none of the disqualifying conditions listed in CVC Section 40610 exist (evidence of persistent negligence, if the violation presents an immediate danger or if the driver refuses to make the correction), I can tell you “yes, that is correctable”.
Considering the fact that I cannot stand it when an officer intentionally assumes a legislative stance as opposed to the enforcement stance that he is granted, I will tell you the whole story.
Based upon what is in CVC section 40303.5, a violation of CVC Section 4000(a).1 is in fact "correctable"…
40303.5.
Whenever any person is arrested for any of the following offenses, the arresting officer shall permit the arrested person to execute a notice containing a promise to correct the violation in accordance with the provisions of Section 40610 unless the arresting officer finds that any of the disqualifying conditions specified in subdivision (b) of Section 40610 exist:
(a) Any registration infraction set forth in Division 3 (commencing with Section 4000).
So how should the officer mark the citation?
According to CVC section 40522, the officer SHALL mark the violation as being “CORRECTABLE”.
40522. Whenever a person is arrested for violations specified in Section 40303.5 and none of the disqualifying conditions set forth in subdivision (b) of Section 40610 exist, and the officer issues a notice to appear, the notice shall specify the offense charged and note in a form approved by the Judicial Council that the charge shall be dismissed on proof of correction. If the arrested person presents, by mail or in person, proof of correction, as prescribed in Section 40616, on or before the date on which the person promised to appear, the court shall dismiss the violation or violations charged pursuant to Section 40303.5.
And what does “SHALL” mean?
According to CVC section 15:
15. "Shall" is mandatory and "may" is permissive.
So it’s not if the officer wants to or feels like it. Shall means HE HAS TO.