Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TRAFFIC LAW > Parking Tickets and Non-Moving Violations

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-30-2004, 09:10 AM
ihateny
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Angry

NYC parking hell


What is the name of your state? NY

Please excuse the cross post. I didn't realize there was a specific area for parking tickets.

Just stick with me on this. New York city has a massive group of workers combing the streets of NY to search for the smallest parking violations and ticket them. I have received such tickets for the most minute of infractions (one for having my CURRENT, NON-EXPIRED registration sticker placed ABOVE the inspection sticker and not to the left of it, another for my registration sticker being expired. The sticker had 07 04 in very large letters. In tiny letters it read July 25, 2004. My ticket came on the 26th.).

Obviously, I can't fight these based on the violations themselves. What I am wondering, and I am in no way a lawyer, is if there is any 14th amendment issues here.

New York hires a disproportionate number of parking violation officers compared to those who monitor moving violations. Would it not stand to reason that if there is a need to enforce parking laws for vehicles that the same number would be needed to enforce moving violations since presumably the same number of vehicles will be in motion at some point?

Also, I live on a one way street that has a stop sign at the end of it at a four way stop. Not only do I see people driving the wrong way up this street every day (it's near an off ramp of the highway) but I also see people run this stop sign every day. I have never seen a police officer hand out a single ticket for either offence and I have reported both to the police. Doesn't this constitute selective enforcement?

The long and short of it is the New York hands out more parking tickets because it makes them more money. It just doesn't seem to me as a lay person that I am receiving equal justice under the law.

I am very interested in this just because of the principal. Do I have any grounds to fight this based on these facts?
    Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-30-2004, 11:06 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by ihateny
What is the name of your state? NY

Please excuse the cross post. I didn't realize there was a specific area for parking tickets.

Just stick with me on this. New York city has a massive group of workers combing the streets of NY to search for the smallest parking violations and ticket them. I have received such tickets for the most minute of infractions (one for having my CURRENT, NON-EXPIRED registration sticker placed ABOVE the inspection sticker and not to the left of it, another for my registration sticker being expired. The sticker had 07 04 in very large letters. In tiny letters it read July 25, 2004. My ticket came on the 26th.).

Obviously, I can't fight these based on the violations themselves. What I am wondering, and I am in no way a lawyer, is if there is any 14th amendment issues here.

New York hires a disproportionate number of parking violation officers compared to those who monitor moving violations. Would it not stand to reason that if there is a need to enforce parking laws for vehicles that the same number would be needed to enforce moving violations since presumably the same number of vehicles will be in motion at some point?

Also, I live on a one way street that has a stop sign at the end of it at a four way stop. Not only do I see people driving the wrong way up this street every day (it's near an off ramp of the highway) but I also see people run this stop sign every day. I have never seen a police officer hand out a single ticket for either offence and I have reported both to the police. Doesn't this constitute selective enforcement?

The long and short of it is the New York hands out more parking tickets because it makes them more money. It just doesn't seem to me as a lay person that I am receiving equal justice under the law.

I am very interested in this just because of the principal. Do I have any grounds to fight this based on these facts?

You're joking, right?
    Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-30-2004, 02:34 PM
ihateny
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wasn't joking but got this answered elsewhere. NM.
    Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-30-2004, 03:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by ihateny
Wasn't joking but got this answered elsewhere. NM.
Yea, it got answered in your OTHER duplicate post.... and why we shoot those idiots that make multiple posts of the same thing!!
at: [url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/showthread.php?t=188827[/url]
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
    Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:20 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.