![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
preparing DMV caseWhat is the name of your state? California I was driving a car with PA license plates in CA when I was pulled over According to the Officers Statement submitted to the DMV I violated code 5200(A) (not hacing a front plate) It also states the owner of the car, who at the time was the passenger, told the officer that he was never issued 2 plates from PA This pullover at 3ishAM resulted in a Minor DUI and failure of proof of insurance. I was never charged with violating the license plate code. The DMV says one option of having the ruling overturned is a unlawful stop. When doing my research a few weeks ago I stumbled accross a CA case involving a pullover of a AZ car with no front license plate. This pullover resulted in the seizure of $9000 worth of marijuana. The case was dismissed when a law stating that if the state that the car has plates representing doesnt require 2 license plates and the state is a contiguos state to the one that it is in (because it could be a commute) then the law from the license plate issueing state is honored. In other words I didnt need one because in PA you dont need one. Does anyone anyone know how I can find that law? Is it a CA state law or a federal one? It sounds federal but I have not been able to find that case again. any other advice? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| There is one little problem in your example for the ticket that was dismissed. Quote:
__________________ If you feel my answer is rude, mean, snarky or in anyway not to your liking, I did my job. You don't need to tell me. No private messages, I do not reply to them. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
Multiple PostMultiple Post - see DUI board.
__________________ A Nor Cal Cop Sergeant "Make mine a double mocha ... And a croissant!" He Who Kneels Before God Can Stand Before Anyone ....author unknown |
![]() |