Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TRAFFIC LAW > Parking Tickets and Non-Moving Violations

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-23-2009, 05:06 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7
Unhappy

Ticketed for being an uninsured motorist... (Illinois)


Last night I was ticketed for driving uninsured. My car sat around for a few months due to engine problems. I cancelled the policy because the car just sat in my garage. Last night finally got it running and went for a test drive. Got a ticket for being uninsured. First time offense, clean record. No other ticket issued. Renewed my insurance this morning. Officer said I can go with proof of insurance before my court date to have the ticket dismissed, but I was uninsured last night.

625 ILCS 5/3-707 [url]http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=062500050K3-707[/url]

What can I do? What can I expect in court?

Illinois has a min. of $500, seems very steep, what is the chance of having this dismissed or the fine lessened.


Quote on a different site:
Quote:
If you get pulled over without proof of insurance in Illinois, your penalty could be a five hundred dollar fine and a sixty day suspension of your registration. Even though these penalties are written in the law, they may not be enforced for a first offense.
Thanks,
Vince

Last edited by Goonie; 05-23-2009 at 05:12 PM.
    Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-23-2009, 05:13 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goonie View Post
What can I do? What can I expect in court?

Illinois has a min. of $500, seems very steep, what is the chance of having this dismissed or the fine lessened.
We have put your question in the 'que' for the Free Advice crystal ball. Since it just came back from the shop, we currently have a 4 day backlog of requests. Please check back every few days and we will post a response when your turn comes up. Thank you for your understanding.
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
    Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-23-2009, 05:27 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by JETX View Post
We have put your question in the 'que' for the Free Advice crystal ball. Since it just came back from the shop, we currently have a 4 day backlog of requests. Please check back every few days and we will post a response when your turn comes up. Thank you for your understanding.
I'm going to presume that this was an attempt of comedy
    Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-23-2009, 05:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goonie View Post
I'm going to presume that this was an attempt of comedy
Yep... just as I presume your asking us what someone else (judge and prosecutor) will do without knowing them or the court. The actual punishment given can fall anywhere between the allowed ranges. In your case, per the statute you cited:
"(c) Except as provided in subsection (c‑5), any operator of a motor vehicle subject to registration under this Code who is convicted of violating this Section is guilty of a business offense and shall be required to pay a fine in excess of $500, but not more than $1,000. However, no person charged with violating this Section shall be convicted if such person produces in court satisfactory evidence that at the time of the arrest the motor vehicle was covered by a liability insurance policy in accordance with Section 7‑601 of this Code. The chief judge of each circuit may designate an officer of the court to review the documentation demonstrating that at the time of arrest the motor vehicle was covered by a liability insurance policy in accordance with Section 7‑601 of this Code.

(c‑1) A person convicted of violating this Section shall also have his or her driver's license, permit, or privileges suspended for 3 months. After the expiration of the 3 months, the person's driver's license, permit, or privileges shall not be reinstated until he or she has paid a reinstatement fee of $100. If a person violates this Section while his or her driver's license, permit, or privileges are suspended under this subsection (c‑1), his or her driver's license, permit, or privileges shall be suspended for an additional 6 months and until he or she pays the reinstatement fee."


Your getting insurance AFTER the citation has no affect on the validity OF the citation.
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
    Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-23-2009, 05:38 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by JETX View Post
Yep... just as I presume your asking us what someone else (judge and prosecutor) will do without knowing them or the court. The actual punishment given can fall anywhere between the allowed ranges. In your case, per the statute you cited:

Completely understood.

I've been to court only once in 28 years, when I was 16 for speeding. So I have no idea what to expect. Was just wondering if it's common practice for the courts to "waive" or lessen the fine based on the circumstances in these types of situations. Should I pledge my case or just plead guilty and go for a ride with the system.

FYI, I take responsibilit for my actions.
    Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-23-2009, 05:55 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Back in LA LA land
Posts: 1,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goonie View Post
Completely understood.

I've been to court only once in 28 years, when I was 16 for speeding. So I have no idea what to expect. Was just wondering if it's common practice for the courts to "waive" or lessen the fine based on the circumstances in these types of situations. Should I pledge my case or just plead guilty and go for a ride with the system.
Driving without insurance is a serious offense in most states so although you might be able to get the fine reduced, I highly doubt you will get it dismissed. Although stranger things have happened in Illinois courts!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goonie View Post
FYI, I take responsibilit for my actions.
You might be better off shifting that responsibility to someone else like an insurance company before you get in an accident.
__________________
"Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security” ~ Benjamin Franklin

Last edited by I_Got_Banned; 05-23-2009 at 05:57 PM.
    Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-02-2009, 04:35 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goonie View Post
Completely understood.

I've been to court only once in 28 years, when I was 16 for speeding. So I have no idea what to expect. Was just wondering if it's common practice for the courts to "waive" or lessen the fine based on the circumstances in these types of situations. Should I pledge my case or just plead guilty and go for a ride with the system.

FYI, I take responsibilit for my actions.
Whether you plead guilty or not is completely up to you. Pleading guilty of course waives your right to a trial and any defenses you might have (although it sounds like you don't have any)--and unless you've negotiated an agreement with the prosecutor BEFOREHAND, it may not do you any good in getting a reduced fine or penalty. You should see a lawyer. This isn't a simple traffic ticket, and a lawyer would be much better prepared to use his leverage and argue on your behalf, whether it's spotting a procedural error, getting you off on a lesser charge, or getting a low fine.

By the way this is NOT a non-moving violation. This is DRIVING without insurance, which is a serious traffic offense, so this was misposted.

Last edited by lawschdropout; 06-02-2009 at 04:37 PM.
    Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-19-2009, 11:53 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7
Update


Went to court today and ticket was dismissed.

The judge was very nice and said that because I got insurance the very next day she would dismiss the charges. No fees no record.
    Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-20-2009, 12:11 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Back in LA LA land
Posts: 1,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goonie View Post
Update


Went to court today and ticket was dismissed.

The judge was very nice and said that because I got insurance the very next day she would dismiss the charges. No fees no record.
She surely was... Good for you!
__________________
"Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security” ~ Benjamin Franklin
    Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.