Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TRAFFIC LAW > Parking Tickets and Non-Moving Violations

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-16-2005, 07:46 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2

Tinting citation while driving out-of-state


What is the name of your state? WI

I am really puzzled!! I live in Wisconsin and my car is registered in Wisconsin.
My windows are tinted 35%. Wisconsin law is 50%. I received a ticket while I was driving thru IOWA for having my windows tinted too dark. The state trooper ticketed me for violating Wisconsin tinting law...that my tint was below the 50% that Wisconsin dictated. It just doesn't make sense at all. How can a state trooper in another state enforce Wisconsin law?

The fine is only $36.50 but the thought of paying for an unjust fine just irritates the crap of out me. Any thoughts? Should I fight it?

Thanks.
    Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-16-2005, 08:40 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,346
Some people will have you argue that Iowa is illegally restricting interstate commerce, but ask them to provide some cases where that argument worked before trying it yourself. $36 is cheap and IMHO not worth the fight.

For a state by state breakdown, from the International Window Film Association (IWFA):

[url]http://www.iwfa.com/iwfa/Law_Chart/State%20Law%20Chart%203-18-05.pdf[/url]
    Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-16-2005, 08:56 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Some Random Guy
Some people will have you argue that Iowa is illegally restricting interstate commerce
Can you list a few arguments these "some people" would supply?
    Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-16-2005, 09:37 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,346
[url]http://home.pcisys.net/~bpc/auto_law/tint/tint_pa.html[/url]
[url]http://www.aoc.state.nc.us/www/public/coa/opinions/1999/980196-1.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.lectlaw.com/files/lws04.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.abfa.com/ogc/news8.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.alexandrialawlibrary.com/reddismiss-2-ord.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.google.com/search?q=window+tinting+interstate+commerce[/url]

BTW, I'm not saying its right or wrong, just that the fight isn't worth it.
    Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-23-2005, 10:55 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 759
Are you absolutely sure that the Trooper cited you for violating Wisconsin law? I've heard this story from people before that were mistaken.
__________________
When did they stop adding fluoride to the water, and start adding STUPID?
    Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-24-2005, 12:12 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 135
Recent events in Georgia's supreme court held that the state's auto tinting law must apply equally to residents and non-residents alike.

The whole law was thrown out and re-wrote.

Seems like most states would be the same.

By the way: tint laws in most states (WI included) read NET.
Net = film applied to glass equals total visable light transmitance (VLT)
If the IWFA site has it correct, then even a 50% film applied to the driver and passenger glass would "meter-out" at less than 50%.

On the positive side, police sometimes give these kinds of tickets in lieu of a real moving violation. If that is the case, you owe the cop a thanks.
    Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-25-2005, 07:36 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2
The trooper DID cite me for violating Wisconsin law. He even said that I was violating WI law by tinting it 35% vs the legal 50%. I was not speeding or violating any traffic law. The ticket is clearly marked that it is for tinting my windows too dark.

Here's something else that's interesting: While reviewing the ticket, the trooper wrote on the ticket that the car I was driving was a 2004 Honda. My car is actually a 2005 Toyota. I'm not sure if this minor mistake is enough to get me off.

Thank you for all the reply. It really helps in making an inform decision to fight the ticket or just pay it and move on.
    Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-25-2005, 07:31 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 135
Legend has it that minor technical mistakes regarding the auto/driver do not void the ticket.

Might see NOLO Press publications ticket defense book.

Still hard to believe the officer could enforce the WI law.
    Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-29-2005, 11:27 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6
Minor clerical errors on the ticket are irrelevant if the officer can still reasonably identify the Who, What, When, and Where. In your case, the ticket claims you were driving a Toyota, rather than a Honda. So you might try to attack the Who by putting him on the stand, and asking him to identify the offending vehicle for the court. If he can, that he mislabeled make on the citation is irrelevant. If he can't, the case should be dismissed.
    Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-30-2005, 01:04 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 135
And don't forget, contrary to what many say, judges are not "liberals" waiting to let law breakers off on technicalities. They are 90% plus former prosecutors with a decidedly pro-police mindset. The mistake was made in good faith. It isn't like he lied to get a search warrant or something.
    Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.