Quote:
Would my resilient member be considered a pivot point and infringe on the claim.
I studied the patent and file history. There is nothing to expand the definition of the pivot point.
|
Have you read up on the doctrine of equivalents? This is a particularly complicated part of patent law, but basically what it says is that in certain cases, under certain facts, that a patent covers not only what it says it covers, but also its equivalents.
Whether or not a "torsion spring" is legally equivalent to a "pivot point" will depend (in part) on a careful reading of the teachings in the specification, whether or not the term "pivot point" was amended, narrowed or clarified during the prosecution of the patent, and whether or not a "torsion spring" was generally known to be an equivalent of a "pivot point" by one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the filing of the patent.
Again, your best bet is to sit down with a local patent attorney, who can review the patent and prosecution history in light of current caselaw and advise you accordingly.