Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & INTERNET LAW > Patents

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-20-2009, 03:13 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 12

Effective Prior Art Date of Publication as Against Applicant’s Own Other Filings


I have a question re: determination of prior art under European or non-US laws (of PCT member countries); i.e. what is going to happen at national stage.

In short, can the US Nonprov. publication of an applicant's own US Nonprov. application be available as prior art as of its priority date ("effective filing date") as opposed to only its publication date and then be used against a later filed PCT application (with a different priority/filing date)?
The PCT application being filed before the publication date but after the 1st priority date?

Phrased another way, what is the effective prior art date in other non-US (i.e. European) countries of a published patent application as applied against the applicant's PCT or foreign application?
Is it the publication date or the priority date?
(assume the PCT or foreign application missed the priority year deadline and its priority date is simply its filing date)

Practical Relevance:
If PCT application misses priority year deadline from US provisional
but a US Nonprov. was filed within 12 mos. from US prov. and will soon publish...can PCT be filed without priority before US Nonprov. publishes?
Or is the only course of action to preserve PCT rights to try to abandon the
US Nonprov. before it publishes and file PCT immediately (albeit without priority).
  #2  
Old 02-23-2009, 04:46 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 7,515
Your best bet is to contact the offices in the different countries that you are disignating to find out -- I don't know if there is some blanket "PCT" treatment of this sort of art. Maybe there is something in MPEP 901.05 that might help? Also, see MPEP 901.03.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.