FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
A landlord HAS to think of themselves as an investor. They have to make a profit being a landlord or it is a losing proposition for them. Most of them make their actual living being a landlord so if they don't make a profit, they can't live. If you cannot grasp that concept, then you will...
That question is very specific to your locality. Building codes vary greatly from municipality to municipality. I can tell you however that your hope that enough needed repairs would change something enough to be considered "new construction" instead of a repair, is unlikely to get you...
I get it. However, when most people ask that question, what they are really asking is what could the person sue for and win. You sometimes inadvertently give the impression that you are expressing an opinion on the validity of the case.
Yes, those are things that someone could do. Again...
Rather than coming back here for more information, it would be in your best interest to consult a local attorney yourself if you receive a letter from an attorney representing her.
Yes, but that doesn't mean that she can or will win a lawsuit making that argument. It just means that she can try. Personally, I think that there is little chance that she could prevail.
Sorry but you are wrong on that. Roaches can get through the tiniest of spaces. They really will converge on your unit and then from your unit they will travel back to the other units when the spray wears off, which will defeat the entire purpose of spraying. Try Quincy's suggestion about the...
If I understood you correctly, the will stated that everything was to go into the trust. Therefore, why do you think it was inappropriate for the proceeds from the sale of the stock to go into the trust account? I am trying to understand what your main complaint is.
I agree. Your attorney knows the climate of the local courts and if he says you have to roll with it, then it is probably safest to roll with it. Also, you don't really have the option to say no. The actual court orders remain in effect until a court changes them.
Adding him to the deed would not normally be considered to be appropriate. Giving him a lien against the property might be appropriate. I promissory note should be involved no matter what.
I do however think that you need to get an attorney involved...for both of your sakes.
It kind of depends on your definition of "have to". I would definitely consider this a "have to". I wouldn't even question whether or not I was legally obligated to do so. My tenant wouldn't have had to ask.
I do not have the answer to your question, but I do have some advice. If your mother is currently still of sound mind, it might simplify things just to have the POA and the Advance Health Care Directive updated to reflect that it is just you.
You have the option of suing the other party. That would force their insurance company to defend them, and perhaps cause them to settle. Since your car would stop you from putting it in reverse if there was someone behind you, then you have more evidence than some people would have.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.