What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? New York
I am embroiled in the most hideously twisted case you could imagine. There are so many issues invovled, but let me hit the high points and ask a question:
Did not commit the crime;
Pissed off undercover cop (alleged);
Anticipatory Warrant issued to Postal Inspector under perjurious statements;
Wrong house searched;
Nothing found (DUH);
Charged with signing for prop box used to gain entry (the charge was made Federal because they alleged the box crossed state lines;
Prop box, containing no postage, identifiying marking,and unopened was "lost", alleged contents rendered "contraband" and never seen by me (defendant) or any of the three lawyers involved;
Fedral Grand Jury testimony perjured to get indictment, they are told there was a "purchase" of illegal materail made. no such evidence EVER existed;
Defendant blackmailed into accepting "plea bargain";
Bargain NOT accepted, Feds carried through on threat;
Second lawyer does NOT submit any evidentiary motions although two are drafted, signed, notorized, etc;
Second lawyer (friend of prosecutor) coerces defendant through wife to take plea;
Case remanded to State/local village court so Spitzer can grab a headline;
NO ALLACUTION MADE! Minutes from supposed allacution are said to be non existant as court recorder states she left the court early;
sentencing reveals that defendant never allacuted or admitted wrong doing AND reveals discord between lawyer and defendant. in two sessions, village judge (not a lawyer) does NOT halt proceedings;
Second lawyer instructed to take bake bargain within 30 days;
Second lawyer abandons client;
several years pass, Defendant is forgotten about;
Defendant advised that proceeding will commence 4 years too late for administrative reasons;
proceedings do NOT occur correctly, but defendant is still treated incorrectly per the applicable laws;
440 motion initiated by 3rd lawyer;
Village Judge denies w/put reading or appropriate comment on controlling cases cited (this judge was recently thrown off the bench for unspecified misconduct around the time of my 440 motion. this may apply to my case) ;
Leave for appeal denied w/out comment;
Spitzer's office admits they know there is no physical evidence despite the fact they maintained there was during 440 proceedure;
Postal Inspector maintains cover story despite lack of ANY evidence, citing computer e-mails from non-exitant computers (defendant's PC's never examined).
OK...NOW...the question is, does this qulify for a Brady based reopneing of the 440? What controllong case citatins could be made to initiate an evidentiary hearing at this point?
The basic case reiterated is I was accused of purchasing illegal material through the mail, and "blackmailed" into taking a plea, but there was no purchase, nothing mailed, no illegal material ever found, please should have been retracted.
I am embroiled in the most hideously twisted case you could imagine. There are so many issues invovled, but let me hit the high points and ask a question:
Did not commit the crime;
Pissed off undercover cop (alleged);
Anticipatory Warrant issued to Postal Inspector under perjurious statements;
Wrong house searched;
Nothing found (DUH);
Charged with signing for prop box used to gain entry (the charge was made Federal because they alleged the box crossed state lines;
Prop box, containing no postage, identifiying marking,and unopened was "lost", alleged contents rendered "contraband" and never seen by me (defendant) or any of the three lawyers involved;
Fedral Grand Jury testimony perjured to get indictment, they are told there was a "purchase" of illegal materail made. no such evidence EVER existed;
Defendant blackmailed into accepting "plea bargain";
Bargain NOT accepted, Feds carried through on threat;
Second lawyer does NOT submit any evidentiary motions although two are drafted, signed, notorized, etc;
Second lawyer (friend of prosecutor) coerces defendant through wife to take plea;
Case remanded to State/local village court so Spitzer can grab a headline;
NO ALLACUTION MADE! Minutes from supposed allacution are said to be non existant as court recorder states she left the court early;
sentencing reveals that defendant never allacuted or admitted wrong doing AND reveals discord between lawyer and defendant. in two sessions, village judge (not a lawyer) does NOT halt proceedings;
Second lawyer instructed to take bake bargain within 30 days;
Second lawyer abandons client;
several years pass, Defendant is forgotten about;
Defendant advised that proceeding will commence 4 years too late for administrative reasons;
proceedings do NOT occur correctly, but defendant is still treated incorrectly per the applicable laws;
440 motion initiated by 3rd lawyer;
Village Judge denies w/put reading or appropriate comment on controlling cases cited (this judge was recently thrown off the bench for unspecified misconduct around the time of my 440 motion. this may apply to my case) ;
Leave for appeal denied w/out comment;
Spitzer's office admits they know there is no physical evidence despite the fact they maintained there was during 440 proceedure;
Postal Inspector maintains cover story despite lack of ANY evidence, citing computer e-mails from non-exitant computers (defendant's PC's never examined).
OK...NOW...the question is, does this qulify for a Brady based reopneing of the 440? What controllong case citatins could be made to initiate an evidentiary hearing at this point?
The basic case reiterated is I was accused of purchasing illegal material through the mail, and "blackmailed" into taking a plea, but there was no purchase, nothing mailed, no illegal material ever found, please should have been retracted.