T
TeethGoneBad
Guest
What is the name of your state? Massachusetts
I have a family member who had over $4000.00 worth of dental work done to their teeth (crownings). They made their down payment of half of the full amount and agreed to do a payment plan from there on in on the balance left.
A little under a year of having these new teeth in place, this family member visited another dentist in the area, who basically said that the crownings should never have been put in place as there was extensive bone loss and these teeth wouldn't last another year--bone loss that would have been existing at the time of the procedure--and in a short amount of time they will require dentures. Problem is this--the dentist who performed this job is taking them to SCC for the balance of 700+ dollars.
Am I wrong in thinking that the dentist was negligent for wasting the patient's money knowing full well these teeth would not last with the condition the teeth were in? Is it feasible to assume that it is possible they will not have to pay the remaining balance on this, or possibly even reimbursement for monies paid on this bogus job? Any advice would be appreciated.
I have a family member who had over $4000.00 worth of dental work done to their teeth (crownings). They made their down payment of half of the full amount and agreed to do a payment plan from there on in on the balance left.
A little under a year of having these new teeth in place, this family member visited another dentist in the area, who basically said that the crownings should never have been put in place as there was extensive bone loss and these teeth wouldn't last another year--bone loss that would have been existing at the time of the procedure--and in a short amount of time they will require dentures. Problem is this--the dentist who performed this job is taking them to SCC for the balance of 700+ dollars.
Am I wrong in thinking that the dentist was negligent for wasting the patient's money knowing full well these teeth would not last with the condition the teeth were in? Is it feasible to assume that it is possible they will not have to pay the remaining balance on this, or possibly even reimbursement for monies paid on this bogus job? Any advice would be appreciated.
Last edited: