With all due respect to each of your situations, and with the realization that individual situations can vary, I *completely* disagree with open adoptions where the bio-parents have contact with the child.
I'm an adoptee, and I think that allowing contact with a birth-parent only confuses the hell out of the child. Who's *really* mom? Who's *really* dad? Those are the questions a child will be wondering....A child cannot differentiate between the different types of roles of parenthood.
You say:
"If she wants to raise a well-adjusted daughter, it's in the best interest of the baby to have contact with you as often as possible. But, being from two different states, it sounds like it couldn't be that frequent. "
****These statements are contradictory of eachother---what do you say to the child? "By the way cupcake, I'm your mommy, but you have another mommy who's going to drop in every now and again, leaving you behind, over and over and over again"
You say:
".......I think my son will benefit knowing that he is loved by his birthmother as well as his parents."
****This message can be conveyed with the story of "your birthmother loved you SSSSSOOO much that she selflessly gave you up in hopes of a better life for you than she felt she could have provided"
You say:
".....when it comes to the welfare and emotional adjustment of the child
........it's only going to be detrimental to the child down the road by cutting off the birthmother."
**** I have no eloquent way of saying this, so I'm going to be blunt and hope you don't take it as an attack. These two statements, in a general sense, are a partyline load of crap. How in God's name is there supposed to be any emotional adjustment or stability for the child if you're taking him/her back and forth??
Again, I state all of this as an adoptee, and from my point of view as such. I am also stating it all in a 'general' sense, with realization that there are varying individual circumstances---BUT the open adoption thing should be the exception, NOT the rule. To me, open adoption is nothing more than signing over custody, getting the benefit of watching the kid grow up, and skating on the financial support. This is all selfish on the part of the birthparent, and completely skewers the whole point behind adoption. Not to mention that it probably sets the ball rolling for the future evolvement of legal proceedings where the adoptee decides they want to live with their 'natural' parents---and the adoptive parents end up paying support b/c they allowed the birthparent in the child's life all along...
All that having been said...... JBreez, I feel for you. Truly I do. You entered into this adoption under a certain set of beliefs, and have been duped by the 'other side'---and that's quite simply not fair to either you or the child.