Wow! Great article, JETX. Like he said, if the mom visits Aunt Minnie before delivery and places the child for adoption in a different state, the "putative registry' has squat legal impact in protecting the biofather's rights.
__________________________________________________
OT Parental Termination elsewhere:
FYI- For my daughter's international adoption, the biomom voluntarily relinquished her legal rights and left her at the orphanage a few weeks after birth. No father was ever named, and no TPRs ever needed. After she was in the orphanage for one year, she became "legally available" for international adoption once she had been "rejected" by five potential Bulgarian Adoptive families. Very few children with any physical abnormality or any hint of Romani parentage (my daughter had both, she was cross-eyed, had some minor hearing problems and is likely at least part Gypsy) are ever adopted by Bulgarian families.
So, once they are legally available they can be "referred" to a potential adoptive family who is not Bulgarian. Then you immediately travel to FIRST meet the child and begin the adoption process. You meet them, LEAVE them at the orphanage and return to the US, and submit your dossier. Then the orphanage director signs off, approving the potential parents and the dossier sits at the Minister of Justice (or Health) until they eventually sign off and pass it on. Eventually, an area court hears it, and if approved, the decree does not become signed and final until a two week publication period for contesting the adoption (almost NEVER happens) is provided. If there is a biofather who thinks he wants rights, he can come forward then, but the judge will often grant the adoption anyway. Reason being, if a kid is already two and the dad left them to stagnat in the orphanage all this time he isn't presumed to be looking out for the child's welfare. Our process took 10 months from meeting trip until she came here. And I understand the entire process was just changed.