A
Alrotha
Guest
What is the name of your state? Texas
Jan 21 2003 I sustained a hyperextended knee injury while on the job. I informed my supervisor and was told to go to the local clinic that handles all of our companies minor medical needs. The doctor had an x-ray done on my knee which showed nothing. She concluded that I merely sprained my knee and I was given a shot and prescribed Vicatin ES. I saw her 2 weeks later for my follow up and still had some swelling. She prescribed more Vicatin ES and had me come back in 2 more weeks. When I came back, the swelling had gone down and she release me back to work at full duty. I work on my feet 12-14 hours per day outside. She knew how strenuous my job was. About 4 weeks later, with severe pain and swelling in my knee I informed my supervisor and was sent back to the same clinic. This time she had an MRI done on my knee and it showed 2 tears in my medial muniscus. She then referred me to a specialist. When I saw the specialist and told him what she had done up to that point he was quite livid that she didnt do an MRI the first day i saw her. He concluded that by her releasing me back to work had further damaged my knee and that the recover time would be substantially more. I ended up missing 7 months of work, although I did draw worker's compensation, it was much lower than what I should have made. The second doctor stated had I seen him first I would have missed 4-6 weeks. Is the first doctor liable for the further damaging of my knee by releasing me early?
Also, I am posting another thread regarding this same doctor for another case.
Jan 21 2003 I sustained a hyperextended knee injury while on the job. I informed my supervisor and was told to go to the local clinic that handles all of our companies minor medical needs. The doctor had an x-ray done on my knee which showed nothing. She concluded that I merely sprained my knee and I was given a shot and prescribed Vicatin ES. I saw her 2 weeks later for my follow up and still had some swelling. She prescribed more Vicatin ES and had me come back in 2 more weeks. When I came back, the swelling had gone down and she release me back to work at full duty. I work on my feet 12-14 hours per day outside. She knew how strenuous my job was. About 4 weeks later, with severe pain and swelling in my knee I informed my supervisor and was sent back to the same clinic. This time she had an MRI done on my knee and it showed 2 tears in my medial muniscus. She then referred me to a specialist. When I saw the specialist and told him what she had done up to that point he was quite livid that she didnt do an MRI the first day i saw her. He concluded that by her releasing me back to work had further damaged my knee and that the recover time would be substantially more. I ended up missing 7 months of work, although I did draw worker's compensation, it was much lower than what I should have made. The second doctor stated had I seen him first I would have missed 4-6 weeks. Is the first doctor liable for the further damaging of my knee by releasing me early?
Also, I am posting another thread regarding this same doctor for another case.