undefinedWhat is the name of your state? CA
Thanks so much for taking the time to read my post and any help you may be able to offer.
I’m the plaintiff on a 5K small claims just heard. This judge by his questioning of the defendant would have left anyone in the courtroom to believe the decision would be for the plaintiff, but as our un-judicial system goes, it was for the defendant.
“Judgment entered as a final disposition on 00/00/04. The court orders that the defendant(s) does not owe plaintiff(s) any money on plaintiff's claim.”
In small claims, unlike regular civil court, the judge gives nothing more than a decision for plaintiff of defendant and how much if any. No explanation is given whatsoever. There are no judge’s notes in the case file either.
I MUST get a new trial on this. There are 2-other related cases. Winning either of these would be contingent on winning the one just heard.
To have a judgment reviewed in small claims (which gives a plaintiff a limited opportunity to have a court reconsider its decision, although not necessarily the right to a hearing) reads:
"A plaintiff who loses may request the small claims court to correct a clerical error in the judgment or set aside and vacate a judgment on the grounds of an incorrect or erroneous legal basis for the decision.
I NEED TO PREPARE A MOTION AND SUBMIT IT THIS MONDAY. The problem is, how do I prepare a motion if the judge lends no explanation for his decision, how does one know what the incorrect or erroneous legal basis is?
This is how the court form reads on:
(SC-108) REQUEST TO CORRECT OR VACATE JUDGMENT
The facts supporting this request to set aside or vacate the judgment on the grounds of an incorrect or erroneous legal basis for the decision are as follows (specify facts, statute, rule of court case law, etc.):
What do I do here? I don’t even know where to begin to look without being able to read the judge’s mind.
To give you an idea, this is what I wrote if I did not have to use “statute, rule of court case law, etc”:
All relevant facts to causes of action were not heard and tried on their merits (of the case.) Defendant’s perjury discredited plaintiff’s testimony. Plaintiff was refused oral argument and submission of statement of fact.
Pleeezzz help me!
Thanks so much for taking the time to read my post and any help you may be able to offer.
I’m the plaintiff on a 5K small claims just heard. This judge by his questioning of the defendant would have left anyone in the courtroom to believe the decision would be for the plaintiff, but as our un-judicial system goes, it was for the defendant.
“Judgment entered as a final disposition on 00/00/04. The court orders that the defendant(s) does not owe plaintiff(s) any money on plaintiff's claim.”
In small claims, unlike regular civil court, the judge gives nothing more than a decision for plaintiff of defendant and how much if any. No explanation is given whatsoever. There are no judge’s notes in the case file either.
I MUST get a new trial on this. There are 2-other related cases. Winning either of these would be contingent on winning the one just heard.
To have a judgment reviewed in small claims (which gives a plaintiff a limited opportunity to have a court reconsider its decision, although not necessarily the right to a hearing) reads:
"A plaintiff who loses may request the small claims court to correct a clerical error in the judgment or set aside and vacate a judgment on the grounds of an incorrect or erroneous legal basis for the decision.
I NEED TO PREPARE A MOTION AND SUBMIT IT THIS MONDAY. The problem is, how do I prepare a motion if the judge lends no explanation for his decision, how does one know what the incorrect or erroneous legal basis is?
This is how the court form reads on:
(SC-108) REQUEST TO CORRECT OR VACATE JUDGMENT
The facts supporting this request to set aside or vacate the judgment on the grounds of an incorrect or erroneous legal basis for the decision are as follows (specify facts, statute, rule of court case law, etc.):
What do I do here? I don’t even know where to begin to look without being able to read the judge’s mind.
To give you an idea, this is what I wrote if I did not have to use “statute, rule of court case law, etc”:
All relevant facts to causes of action were not heard and tried on their merits (of the case.) Defendant’s perjury discredited plaintiff’s testimony. Plaintiff was refused oral argument and submission of statement of fact.
Pleeezzz help me!