A
AzMojoMan
Guest
I was cited by the City for parking on a non-dust free lot owned by the city. There were no "no-parking" signs posted. There were other cars parked on this lot before I arrived that were still there after I left that did NOT get ticketed. These cars were not marked specially and had no permits displayed. I drive by this lot almost daily and there are usually vehicles parked there, and I have never noticed a ticket in their windshields. Because of this I thought it was OK, I had no idea this was against the law.
This is only a $50 ticket, I would like to fight it myself. Is there any precedent, or legal terms I can use to describe how I was unfairly singled out? I wouldn't have any problem with the ticket if they had ticketed everyone there, but when my car is singled out, I do have a problem.
I did take a picture of the scene and the other vehicles, but there will be no proof of when I took the pictures. Until it goes to court, I can take pictures of unticketed vehicles parked on the lot to further prove my case if it would help.
Do I have a valid reason to fight with? Don't the police have to be consistent and active (not selective) in enforcement?
This is only a $50 ticket, I would like to fight it myself. Is there any precedent, or legal terms I can use to describe how I was unfairly singled out? I wouldn't have any problem with the ticket if they had ticketed everyone there, but when my car is singled out, I do have a problem.
I did take a picture of the scene and the other vehicles, but there will be no proof of when I took the pictures. Until it goes to court, I can take pictures of unticketed vehicles parked on the lot to further prove my case if it would help.
Do I have a valid reason to fight with? Don't the police have to be consistent and active (not selective) in enforcement?