I was cited in error for speeding by the Oklahoma HP. I knew the trooper was up ahead because a farmer in an old truck had warned me. Consequently, I went past him at the requisite 55 mph. There were multiple errors in his procedure and on the face of the ticket. I pled not guilty but gave the Asst DA a chance to withdraw the ticket before trial because he and I both knew he would lose in court. He said he would not default me for not showing up on the date indicated on the ticket and would contact me once he had “looked at it.” In short, he lied to me. He did default me. Court personnel then lost the case somewhere in the bowels of their system and I did not hear from the court for over a year. I finally got in touch with the judge, outlined my situation and he then dismissed the case with prejudice. Apparently, I was not the first person so treated by the ADA.
I have already extracted vast revenge against the state but I want to extend this on a more personal note to the ADA. Yes, I can prove he lied to me. I can also obtain testimony that others have had similar treatment.
I have two questions:
1. Is it best to file an ethical complaint directly with the state bar or to go through another attorney?
2. How long will it be before I get a smart aleck response to my post?
The Over/Under on this currently stands at 34 minutes.
I have already extracted vast revenge against the state but I want to extend this on a more personal note to the ADA. Yes, I can prove he lied to me. I can also obtain testimony that others have had similar treatment.
I have two questions:
1. Is it best to file an ethical complaint directly with the state bar or to go through another attorney?
2. How long will it be before I get a smart aleck response to my post?
The Over/Under on this currently stands at 34 minutes.