frcisafraud
Member
What is the name of your state? What is the name of your state? UT/WY
Do civil local courts have power or authority on tax issues over the IRS?
My understanding is that the person who provided the care for more than 50% time and expenses is the one entitled to the EIC credit. Is that not correct? I have an issue where I did as I believed I should and as advised by H&R Block. The IRS is trying to garnish my wages and I am being penilized essentially for being the responsible parent.
Does anyone have any experience or relevant case history that may benifit me?
The papers stated I could claim both children and at which time she can benifit she can claim one, but I understand that as 1) The child Tax credit not the EIC as per my understanding of the IRS code and as was advised to me by H&R block.
This area is a little grey and I think attorneys ought to be educated enough to clarify this issue in the decree so that it doesnt send clients back to them to pad there pockets because the attorney was to incompittent or scrupolous to clarify the issue and used vague language!
Any thoughts or advice?
Do civil local courts have power or authority on tax issues over the IRS?
My understanding is that the person who provided the care for more than 50% time and expenses is the one entitled to the EIC credit. Is that not correct? I have an issue where I did as I believed I should and as advised by H&R Block. The IRS is trying to garnish my wages and I am being penilized essentially for being the responsible parent.
Does anyone have any experience or relevant case history that may benifit me?
The papers stated I could claim both children and at which time she can benifit she can claim one, but I understand that as 1) The child Tax credit not the EIC as per my understanding of the IRS code and as was advised to me by H&R block.
This area is a little grey and I think attorneys ought to be educated enough to clarify this issue in the decree so that it doesnt send clients back to them to pad there pockets because the attorney was to incompittent or scrupolous to clarify the issue and used vague language!
Any thoughts or advice?