Which part do you think I am wrong on?
1. That a ladybird deed may not make the asset unavailable from a current medicaid lien?
2. That you can remove assets from your ownership (hence, availability to paying back for the cost of care) and take back an income stream during your lifetime?
3. That doing #2 requires specialized knowledge to make sure it accomplishes the goals one wants?
4. That people with the knowledge of #3 are expensive?
5. That some with the knowledge of #3 sometimes think it is unethical to manipulate things so you have me pay for your medical care rather than you?
Error edit:
Oops, looked it up. Because Florida law has a very strict homestead act, a lien won't attach if certain conditions are met. (Homestead property, intent to return or spouse/dependent relative live there) Then, since the lien is not able to be attached during the lifetime, it attaches at death. The ladybird (aka enhanced life estate deed) has a provision to transfer ownership at death. The penalty period is not invoked as there is no "gift" until death. In Florida it might work. I use might because there are still some issues to resolve. There is a limit if the spouse or dependant is not living in the home. If you are below that limit on a homesteaded property, you wouldn't need the ladybird deed per the Florida constitution. You still need to handle the taxes, insurance and upkeep on the home, so I suppose that's why you're looking at the irrevocable trust to take back income.