GGtheMachine
Junior Member
Tn.
1) Claimant sued for lost wages on days of which the claimant had already received FMLA compensation.
2) Claimant swore one vehicle was traded for another, to avoid paying taxes/fees when no such trade ever occurred and can be verified via uninterested third party that sold saod traded for vehicle.
3) 7 counts of aggrevated perjury in black and white sworn conflicting answers.
The local DA has no interest in assisting and we'll say due to political reasons. What agency or person would have interest in the first two issues?
1) Claimant sued for lost wages on days of which the claimant had already received FMLA compensation.
2) Claimant swore one vehicle was traded for another, to avoid paying taxes/fees when no such trade ever occurred and can be verified via uninterested third party that sold saod traded for vehicle.
3) 7 counts of aggrevated perjury in black and white sworn conflicting answers.
The local DA has no interest in assisting and we'll say due to political reasons. What agency or person would have interest in the first two issues?
Last edited: