Insurance companies have traded information, there was NO damage and NO injury.
i have received this advice, what do you think?
"If you have a clear case of no injury and no damage, Move for dismissal due to lack of evidence that an impact occurred reaching the level necessary to be considered hit and run. Your argument would be yes the vehicles touched, but based on your knowledge of physics and cars, the impact was so slight as to not provide opportunity for damage. Your assumption, proven correct in later confirmation, was that such a slight impact was also insufficient to cause injury. If you can claim without contradiction that you saw a gesture or absence of a gesture or a movement in the person in the other vehicle that suggested to you it was okay with them if you left, you could make this a case the judge isn't interested in having take up space in his court.
On the merits of your argument, I think you are swimming upstream to get a free pass on this unless you get lucky with the dismissal. I would expect it to go down in this way: If the judge denies your motion to dismiss, you'll enter a plea of not guilty. A date will be set for trial. You contact the prosecutor assigned to the case and express your willingness to go to trial on the argument you have, but in the interests of the expense to the community and the hassle of a trial for all involved, you'll accept a ticket for inattentive driving or something like that.
They will take the deal unless there are more facts you haven't yet provided."