• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Despite earlier losses the estate of Dame Jean Conan Doyle is at it again.

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

FlyingRon

Senior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Yes

http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/16/us/sherlock-holmes-supreme-court/index.html?hpt=ju_c2
 


FlyingRon

Senior Member
I'm not sympathetic at all. The stated "if these things are in the public domain we can't make money" is hardly a compelling argument.
We've travelled way outside copyright protection to claim that nobody can use a character invented in a book that is now in the public domain. Contrary to their assertions, all the character development really needed for much of the derivative stuff was laid down in A Study In Scarlet.
 

quincy

Senior Member
I'm not sympathetic at all. The stated "if these things are in the public domain we can't make money" is hardly a compelling argument.
We've travelled way outside copyright protection to claim that nobody can use a character invented in a book that is now in the public domain. Contrary to their assertions, all the character development really needed for much of the derivative stuff was laid down in A Study In Scarlet.
The argument is definitely about money but it is also about the characters that have appeared in a series of books that span many years, with ten books are not yet in the public domain. They remain copyright-protected.

I can see where a legitimate argument is made for protecting the characters. It can be said that the characters were being developed from first book to last, and the last have the fully developed characters that are still rights-protected.

At any rate, whenever the copyright actions by Doyle's estate are exhausted, and when it is finally decided when it will be that the characters must join the pre-1923 Sherlock books already in the public domain, there are probably not too many people who will want to use Sherlock or Watson as characters, over the risk of infringing on the trademark rights in the characters that are held by the estate.

But I guess I can be happy with whatever is finally decided. :)
 
Last edited:

FlyingRon

Senior Member
I don't have any problem with them asserting trademark rights (if in fact the have them). I have an issue with perverting copyright beyond what it is intended to do.
 

quincy

Senior Member
I don't have any problem with them asserting trademark rights (if in fact the have them). I have an issue with perverting copyright beyond what it is intended to do.
Copyright law is already perverted, if you ask tranquility. :D

I admit I have mixed feelings on where Sherlock and Watson belong - under the protective wing of copyright law or in the public domain with most of their tales. I guess the problem for me is that I can see and accept as legitimate the arguments coming from both sides - and nothing yet is tipping the balance for me.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top