qadaq said:
My original post was "motorized bicycle catch-22". I looked at the other posts and found the site interesting. The name of the site is "freeadvice.com" not "freelegaladvice.com". I am trying to give possible ideas as to how to proceed. I would leave it to the lawyers on this site but often, my post being a good example, they've been condescending and not given any useful information.
My response:
That's because your posts are absolute garbage.
Take your response to our writer as an example, above. You want him to, perhaps, talk to the prosecutor. There was NO prosecutor in our writer's case - - that's because at the preliminary hearing in front of the judge, and on his own, and with the judge holding a copy of the ticket, our writer pleaded guilty.
Do you really think that the prosecutor is going to look at our writer's situation when it's now over ? The prosecutor has real cases, and current cases, to worry about and try. Once our writer pleaded guilty, his case became "old news" - - and there's nothing anyone can, or will, do about it.
Halket's response was right on the mark. Yours, however, was out in space.
IAAL