A
angel52294
Guest
Proposed Conclusions and Findings CASA
Where it is bold and under lined I do not know what to put were the xxxxxx are in Item 1 . The court accepted the hearsay testimony of CASA X as reported by CASA Y. However, by the rules of xxxxxx in Juvenile Court, such testimony is inadmissible except as qualified by xxxxxx, and these qualifications were not met. can you help me? We are in Pa.
"Proposed Conclusions and Findings on date xx/xx/xx Regarding the Evidentiary (or Dispositional or Adjudicatory or ?) Hearing Case #xxxxxx as submitted by the Parents, George and Freda InnocentGuys" ? Then, in state something like:
Item 1. The court accepted the hearsay testimony of CASA X as reported by CASA Y. However, by the rules of xxxxxx in Juvenile Court, such testimony is inadmissible except as qualified by xxxxxx, and these qualifications were not met. Therefore the testimony of CASA Y with regard to CASA X's client having sexual relations with CASA Y's client on the night of xx/xx/xx, CASA X's client sleeping on the InnocentGuys' floor of the same night, and the InnocentGuys' house being strewn with xxxxxx on the same night, should be stricken from the record as inadmissible evidence.
Item 2. Caseworker Z has stated consistently in his/her reports and in court on dates xx/xx/xx that the InnocentGuys' home is presentable, safe and clean. (Attach any written proof.) This is further evidence that the hearsay evidence of CASA Y ought to be stricken from the record, as stated
in Item 1. Caseworker Z has stated consistently that the Parents' childrearing style is appropriate and in the best interests of Child Chuckie InnocentGuy.
Item 3. Mother, Freda InnocentGuy stated that Chuckie InnocentGuy is doing well in school, and so and and so forth. (Attach any proof.)
Item 4. Child Chuckie InnocentGuy is doing well (repeat appropriate testimony) and desires to return to his home with Parents George and Freda
InnocentGuy.
Item 5. Judge Knickers informed the mother, Freda InnocentGuy, that she was "a bad xxxxxxxxxxxxx," based upon evidence presented by CASA Y, whose testimony should be stricken from the record (Item 1.) By reason of summary statements made upon inadmissible testimony, the InnocentGuy Parents request
that Judge Knickers' statements regarding the quality of Freda InnocentGuy's housekeeping and childrearing also be stricken from the record. (I suppose this is insulting and doesn't help...?)
Item 6. Any other testimony which needs clarifying or verifying.
In summary, it would seem in the best interest of Chuckie InnocentGuy for the court to continue to rely upon the consistent testimony of Caseworker Z, who, over the course of xxx days since he/she assumed the InnocentGuys' case, has avered that the InnocentGuys maintain a suitable and nurturing home
(Item 2), and which is further supported by the statements and proofs of Mother Freda InnocentGuy
(Item 3) and the progress of Child Chuckie InnocentGuy
(Item 4). In light of this consistent evidence, the Court may be assured that Chuckie InnocentGuy's best interests would be best served by xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
We, the Parents, George and Freda InnocentGuy, request a xxxxxxxxxxx Hearing
to follow up within xxx days (- or something to that effect).
Where it is bold and under lined I do not know what to put were the xxxxxx are in Item 1 . The court accepted the hearsay testimony of CASA X as reported by CASA Y. However, by the rules of xxxxxx in Juvenile Court, such testimony is inadmissible except as qualified by xxxxxx, and these qualifications were not met. can you help me? We are in Pa.
"Proposed Conclusions and Findings on date xx/xx/xx Regarding the Evidentiary (or Dispositional or Adjudicatory or ?) Hearing Case #xxxxxx as submitted by the Parents, George and Freda InnocentGuys" ? Then, in state something like:
Item 1. The court accepted the hearsay testimony of CASA X as reported by CASA Y. However, by the rules of xxxxxx in Juvenile Court, such testimony is inadmissible except as qualified by xxxxxx, and these qualifications were not met. Therefore the testimony of CASA Y with regard to CASA X's client having sexual relations with CASA Y's client on the night of xx/xx/xx, CASA X's client sleeping on the InnocentGuys' floor of the same night, and the InnocentGuys' house being strewn with xxxxxx on the same night, should be stricken from the record as inadmissible evidence.
Item 2. Caseworker Z has stated consistently in his/her reports and in court on dates xx/xx/xx that the InnocentGuys' home is presentable, safe and clean. (Attach any written proof.) This is further evidence that the hearsay evidence of CASA Y ought to be stricken from the record, as stated
in Item 1. Caseworker Z has stated consistently that the Parents' childrearing style is appropriate and in the best interests of Child Chuckie InnocentGuy.
Item 3. Mother, Freda InnocentGuy stated that Chuckie InnocentGuy is doing well in school, and so and and so forth. (Attach any proof.)
Item 4. Child Chuckie InnocentGuy is doing well (repeat appropriate testimony) and desires to return to his home with Parents George and Freda
InnocentGuy.
Item 5. Judge Knickers informed the mother, Freda InnocentGuy, that she was "a bad xxxxxxxxxxxxx," based upon evidence presented by CASA Y, whose testimony should be stricken from the record (Item 1.) By reason of summary statements made upon inadmissible testimony, the InnocentGuy Parents request
that Judge Knickers' statements regarding the quality of Freda InnocentGuy's housekeeping and childrearing also be stricken from the record. (I suppose this is insulting and doesn't help...?)
Item 6. Any other testimony which needs clarifying or verifying.
In summary, it would seem in the best interest of Chuckie InnocentGuy for the court to continue to rely upon the consistent testimony of Caseworker Z, who, over the course of xxx days since he/she assumed the InnocentGuys' case, has avered that the InnocentGuys maintain a suitable and nurturing home
(Item 2), and which is further supported by the statements and proofs of Mother Freda InnocentGuy
(Item 3) and the progress of Child Chuckie InnocentGuy
(Item 4). In light of this consistent evidence, the Court may be assured that Chuckie InnocentGuy's best interests would be best served by xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
We, the Parents, George and Freda InnocentGuy, request a xxxxxxxxxxx Hearing
to follow up within xxx days (- or something to that effect).