L
lbezphil
Guest
I WAS ARRESTED AND CHARGED WITH EMBEZZELEMENT IN 1991. IN APRIL OF 1991, I RECEIVED A 1099 MISC. FROM THE PLAINTIFF, STATING THAT THE MONEY WAS NON-EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION. THIS WAS AFTER THE COURT ORDERED ME TO PAY RESTITUTION TO THE PLAINTIFF. I DID SOME TIME, AND WHEN I GOT OUT, I STARTED MY PAYMENTS. IN THE MEANTIME THE IRS WANTED TO GARNISH MY WAGES FOR THE BACK TAXES, SO I FILED BANKRUPTCY (CHPT. 13) WHEN I HAD MY HEARING, THE PLAINTIFFS ATTNY'S STATED THAT THE MONEY I EMBEZZELED COULD NOT BE INCLUDED BECAUSE OF THE COURT ORDER. 3 MONTHS LATER THEY FILED ON IT. WHAT DO I DO? THE JUDGE IN MY CRIMINAL CASE KEEPS EXTENDING MY PROBATION SO HE CAN ENFORCE THE PAYMENTS, BUT IN THE MEANTIME MY BANKRUPTCY IS UP IN 6 MONTHS AND I HAVE ANOTHER 20 YEARS TO PAY ON THE RESTITUTION. WHEN MY BANKRUPTCY IS UP, IS THE COURT ORDER NULL AND VOID? OR CAN THE JUDGE KEEP EXTENDING MY PROBATION UNTIL 2020?