Constitution Rights as I was told!!!

1) The Constitution (unless changed) clearly states that a person or defendent has right to view all evidence, including upto and including his arrest. Any violations to this is a serious violation to both the Judge and the Prosecutor (even on the Federal side), and both can be reprimanded, fined and/or dismissed.

2) A defendent can get a listing of names, ethnic backgrounds, races, ages, and perhaps even addresses of all Grand Jurors who indicted him. It does clearly state in Constitution that one has to be Judged by his peers, and to know the right of his accused. It also states that there could be prejudice from particular areas of where the Grand Jurors came from, and can be used as prejudice against the defendent. Addresses can be given up of Grand Jurors.

3) Yes, a defendent has a right to represent himself, in fact that was the norm back in the Colonial days, and before Amendments in the Constitution conflicted with each other. Also Law Enforcement persons can not use scare tactics to force a defendent to hire a paid lawyer, which they commonly use today.

4) Yes!, any alignment of Judge and Prosecutor working in Cohoots, can be deemed a serious violation of the law, and can result in the fine, dismissal, and/or imprisonment ofthe Judge and Prosecutor.

5) Most Prosecutors do not have the right to act improper regarding the News media (any media type), and do not have the right to embarrass any defendent in the News to the point of not being Judged fairly in a court of law. And 5b of your question, your not suppose to know how the Federal Prison System is set-up, How did you find out? You must be extremely smart, have ESP, or somebody tipped you off.

Well there you are Johnny Wizard all answers to your questions. Go after the Judge & Prosecutor if they did you wrong, which it sounds like they did. It looks like they'll be doing some jail time with the very inmates they indicted. Good for you!!!

# 5....what about pros/D.A. behavior in/during court? Can state label verbally (murder,deadbeat,etc) or verbally taunt a defendent? If state is plaintiff, what are D.A.'s rights to collect for services....can D.A. arrest someone for non payment of fee?

Constitutional Laws as I was told!!

Hey smh33!, Whose side are you on? anyhow?

When you "start speaking sense", and are "honest with your replies" to the "original subject", then contact me.

You seem to have some kind of vested interest in #5 of Constitutional Laws as I was told, does it hit "home base" for you??

Hey if you are a "Prosecutor" and a "defendent" beat you out, admit defeat, and "end you losses", and "take it like a man!!!", if the "defendent" can, then you should very well do the same!!. Don't act like a "colicky baby", when you lose!!!!!

I surely hate spoiled and sore loser Prosecutors!!, they are almost as bad as "temper tandrum kids"!!!

Johnny Wizard II

What the H - -- are you talking about? I was simply tagging on to your post about proper actions/procedures.

I only saw this one post. Am I a prosecutor? Are you paranoid?
No I am not a prosecutor but I have experianced what I feel is very questionable behavior on behalf of a prosecutor. I just was curious as to what the limits are, how degrading can the D.A. be verbally when one is still innocent 'until proven guilty'...that is how it still works right?

Perhaps you should practice a little of the 'innocent until PROVEN guilty' before you start slinging accusations. Your response was no better than what I would expect to find in a courtroom or from a prosecutor.
If you can not answer my questions, then you should say nothing at all!

In Addition

From the previous "diatribe", now I know your a "moronic", (spoiled/temper tandrum) Federal Prosecutor. How dumb do you think I am, do you think I was born yesterday, or the day before that. If your a "Law Enforcement", or your a "Fed", just own up, to that a 1st time offender (Johnny Wizard), beat you out!!, Own up to it, and write the dam articles in the "Newspapers (Associated Press), on how you embarrassed me, now you embarrass yourself and the U.S. Government, with its top notch FBI agents. Do the dam artcle already!!!. With "agents posing as Prisoners", and me figuring it out...(The whole "Federal Prison System")

Johnny Wizard II 4 ever..

Mr. Wizard...

...what are you smokin'? Would you send me some? Maybe then I could respond!

charlie

Here we go again (Reaganism)

Well!, I can use the old expression of "Plausible Denial" as most FBI, CIA, KGB, etc.. use. But, "hey", I don't play that game. I'm better than the system, and thats an embarrassment in "leu" of a "1st time offender" in the Federal Prison System. Lets put it this way!!, I am going to be the "major monkey wrench" in the Systems (and there is a System or Power Elites) Plan.

Now!, you have a choice, in fact I'll leave it as an expression. If you can't beat'm you might as well let them join'm.

I think you get "my drift...."

Yes, you are dumb if you think that I am affiliated with law enforcement. Perhaps you should reread my post....I was asking for further detail as to what is unacceptable behavior by prosecution...verbally. I AM THE DEFENDENT...hello???????
I don't think I need your advice afterall...did not realize you were mental.

Organizations that you might represent..

IACIS (The International Association of Computer Investigative Specialist)
Donahue, IA

or

HTCIA (High Technology Crime Investigation Association)
Amissville, VA

or

NW3C (National White Collar Crime Center)
Richmond, VA or Fairmont, WV

These Organizations manufacture or investigate crime.

The "FBI" is also involved, but they're too stupid to be classed with the above...

Johnny Wizard II 4 ever...

What information could those organizations offer me? I stated before that I am not familiar with what your original case or issue was about, but I feel I have been treated unfairly in court...in the sense of...don't they(courts/D.A.) have to abide by some form of standard conduct?... I and others were 'literally' taunted, called names by the D.A. prosecuting and I have never and never thought that was how our judicial system worked. I just wondered if there was a standard and if there was any course of remedy. I have complained to my senator, who would has requested for me to send transcripts of the hearing...........TWO YEARS now I have been tring to get the tapes....of course the 'original' original tape has been missplaced and every copy I get..4 now...is in a fast record mode. I have looked into transcribing...my hearing was 5 1/2 hours which = about 12-1500 dollars for transcribing. The clerks say the tapes SHOULD be in normal speed but 4xs now they have not. I feel the courts/clerks are stalling....know the transcript could be bad for reps I guess...I have even had a lawyer try to obtain & they stalled him..he did not even charge me because of all the trouble tring to get the tape...says he has never seen anything like this. Is there a recourse, a group that could help...organization?

Reality Check (Re: Previous Write In)

Unfortunetly, the Dept of Justice (D.O.J.) does have to follow its own doctrine, it doesn't have to follow the "Constitutional Laws" afforded to a defendent. The FBI, CIA, KGB or whomever are inept, incompetent, and whats worse is they're in charge of Security of this Country-Makes you wonder why September 11, 2001 didn't happen sooner.

But anyhow, the Prosecutor acting in cohoots with the Judge (even on the Federal side) doesn't have to surrender any tapes, videos or whatnot. Its their "card game" and unfortunetly they have the "cards" marked!!.They (The D.O.J.) do this because they know on an "even keeling", they would loose in the "Court of Law", so they have decided, back in 1989, that they don't have to play by the rules.

The D.O.J. is trying to operate in a Profit-Orientated mode (since 1989), they beleive by operating this way they will be ahead of the game, Boy! are they so wrong, but hey thats their trip. By this modality (trying to go after Profit-Orientated Cases), there will be more Crime, more Robberies, more murders, and more everything related to crime. But then again the idea of the Justice Dept. is to make the Economic Pie (their slice of the pie) bigger (as viewed on an I.R.S. form in the back) for themselves, but with that mentality Russia will be leaps and bounds ahead of the U.S.A. technology wise.

Good luck with getting back the tapes, videos, -it will never happen!!..


Johnny Wizard 2 4-ever