Thank you, Quincy.
The State: California
The Question: Do I have a case that would stand up in small claims court?
The Scenario: A former co-worker / friend asked me to babysit her 2 cats for about 6 weeks while she moved to Texas and her daughter resituated herself in a cat-friendly apartment. Immediately, 1 cat started peeing on the wood floors and then on my sofa. On the 5th or 6th week, the 2nd kitty started peeing on the couch. I found out soon after that the cats were allowed to regularly pee on my friend's carpet. I continued with the agreement, however, mostly out of sympathy for the cats (friend was going to give it to a homeless person), and also because she was a friend.
I billed my friend approx $980, all related to the well being and repair/replacement of damages done.
Food $50
Cleaning Agents $30
Litter $45
Litterboxes $35
Pee Pads $45
Plastic Covering for Sofa $80
Paper Towels $7
Deep Clean Sofa $200
Dry Clean Pillows $140
Replace Pillows $75
Replace Cat Scratcher (Peed on) $20
My Services $250
-------------------
Total $982
Unfortunately there was no written contract and the oral agreement, in retrospect, probably was not clear. She asked how much I want for food and for my services. I did not give her an answer as if it were nominal, I would not charge her. Along the way, when the cats got messier, she said that should would pay for damages made by her cats. I even gave her a heads up when I started having a lengthy and expensive list, so there were no surprises. She gave me $50 in the beginning for cat food and since has agreed to pay $200 for sofa dry cleaning.
What legal recourse do I have?
Thank you for your feedback in advance! It is much appreciated!
Freda
No, they had said their kitties would use my litter box. They just needed to be shown once where it was.Didn't you find it odd when the owner didn't provide a litter box when the cats were brought to you?
I disagree - it's actually not common for cats to use an unfamiliar and used litter box. The OP shouldn't have given the cats free roaming privileges in his/her house.It's not your fault for letting them roam around the house. 90% or more of house cats do not behave this way, and since (it appears) you have cats of your own that behave themselves, you wouldn't have had any reason to believe these cats would behave any differently. In addition, the cats' owner told you that they would pee in your cats' litterbox (while neglecting to advise you that she allowed them to pee on her carpet on a regular basis). So no, you had no reason to suspect that these particular cats would pee all over the place.
(I wouldn't have either, I had three cats who were naturally very well-behaved, no training on my part, always used the litter box - well, the eldest started peeing a little bit once per day on the carpet in one corner of the bedroom when he turned 16, but he was very old, to be expected at that age - so really I wouldn't have expected otherwise from other cats.)
Except then perhaps OP's coworker should have provided a litter box? And also told OP about the regular peeing on the carpet? If I was OP's coworker I would have brought my own litterbox over (why not? why just throw it out? why not just let OP determine if it's required and then dispose of it or not as circumstances dictate?) - even if I thought my cats would use OP's litterbox. And if my cats' litterbox was in fact my carpet? Well, it wouldn't be...but if it was, I would have felt seriously obliged to advise OP of that.I disagree - it's actually not common for cats to use an unfamiliar and used litter box. The OP shouldn't have given the cats free roaming privileges in his/her house.
While I disagree, let's assume that yours is the correct viewpoint. The OP found out about this problem "immediately"...s/he had a duty to mitigate, however, s/he allowed the cats free reign of the house for in excess of six weeks.Except then perhaps OP's coworker should have provided a litter box? And also told OP about the regular peeing on the carpet? If I was OP's coworker I would have brought my own litterbox over (why not? why just throw it out? why not just let OP determine if it's required and then dispose of it or not as circumstances dictate?) - even if I thought my cats would use OP's litterbox. And if my cats' litterbox was in fact my carpet? Well, it wouldn't be...but if it was, I would have felt seriously obliged to advise OP of that.
While I can see OP was possibly somewhat negligent, I think OP's coworker is more at fault here.
ok.while i disagree, let's assume that yours is the correct viewpoint. The op found out about this problem "immediately"...s/he had a duty to mitigate, however, s/he allowed the cats free reign of the house for in excess of six weeks.
Also friend declawed her cats and I learned that litter avoidance and biting comes from that. They have phantom pain from their amputated toes.It's not your fault for letting them roam around the house. 90% or more of house cats do not behave this way, and since (it appears) you have cats of your own that behave themselves, you wouldn't have had any reason to believe these cats would behave any differently. In addition, the cats' owner told you that they would pee in your cats' litterbox (while neglecting to advise you that she allowed them to pee on her carpet on a regular basis). So no, you had no reason to suspect that these particular cats would pee all over the place.
(I wouldn't have either, I had three cats who were naturally very well-behaved, no training on my part, always used the litter box - well, the eldest started peeing a little bit once per day on the carpet in one corner of the bedroom when he turned 16, but he was very old, to be expected at that age - so really I wouldn't have expected otherwise from other cats.)
$250 / 42 days = $6 per day. The cat boarding place was $50 - $100 a day which she refused to pay."My Services $250"
Your "services"? Good luck with that one. Are you a licensed pet sitter? The court is likely to ask where in your contract you listed your pet sitting services.
Gail