juneflight
Junior Member
What is the name of your state? CA
Okay, I've read most of the forum posts regarding botched EBay sales. I have a couple questions and request for opinion that I would appreciate your time reading. Thanks!
First, brief story: I sold ~$1k item to person in another state. Buyer claimed arrived "broken." Buyer proceeded to initiate chargeback, intimidate, etc. I asked for patience while insurance claim was being processed. Buyer escalated emails, demands, etc. Fedex responded some time later "will not insure, package insufficiently packed." Huh, that's weird! I tracked down the agent in buyer's town who said "recipient noted that shipper was likely shipping broken goods intentionally." Implication was that that prompted the insurance rejection.
Received broken item several days later. Unpacked and found... item works fine. ?!
Sent note to buyer indicating item was fine and would offer either to refund original price minus $300 for depreciation and to cover some of the cost of my nearly 50 hours I'd put into working shipping agent and ebay over on his behalf. Also offered alternative of shipping item back to him.
Approx. one year later I hear "I have filed suit in small claims."
Approx. one year later I hear "I have received default judgment against you" in buyer's county court.
Approx. one year later I'm getting emails and demands to pay up again. Notice from him of amount of judgment, interest rate, yadda yadda.
Questions are:
1. Don't I have to be served notice that I'm going to be in court?
2. What constitutes a legitimate "serving?" (His claim is that notice was mailed to my work address.)
3. Can I contest the judgment on these grounds?
4. Can I do #3 from here?
5. Do I need to anyway? Still feels like he's basically blowing smoke.
6. I read about domestication of his judgment. How much does this cost/what's the effort entailed? I can't seem to get a sense of this.
7. Will domestication even be permitted since it was a default judgment?
8. At that time, can I challenge it again on grounds that I never knew of the claim to begin with? Better to do that or something else?
Finally,
9. What would you do in this situation?
Thanks for your thoughts.
Okay, I've read most of the forum posts regarding botched EBay sales. I have a couple questions and request for opinion that I would appreciate your time reading. Thanks!
First, brief story: I sold ~$1k item to person in another state. Buyer claimed arrived "broken." Buyer proceeded to initiate chargeback, intimidate, etc. I asked for patience while insurance claim was being processed. Buyer escalated emails, demands, etc. Fedex responded some time later "will not insure, package insufficiently packed." Huh, that's weird! I tracked down the agent in buyer's town who said "recipient noted that shipper was likely shipping broken goods intentionally." Implication was that that prompted the insurance rejection.
Received broken item several days later. Unpacked and found... item works fine. ?!
Sent note to buyer indicating item was fine and would offer either to refund original price minus $300 for depreciation and to cover some of the cost of my nearly 50 hours I'd put into working shipping agent and ebay over on his behalf. Also offered alternative of shipping item back to him.
Approx. one year later I hear "I have filed suit in small claims."
Approx. one year later I hear "I have received default judgment against you" in buyer's county court.
Approx. one year later I'm getting emails and demands to pay up again. Notice from him of amount of judgment, interest rate, yadda yadda.
Questions are:
1. Don't I have to be served notice that I'm going to be in court?
2. What constitutes a legitimate "serving?" (His claim is that notice was mailed to my work address.)
3. Can I contest the judgment on these grounds?
4. Can I do #3 from here?
5. Do I need to anyway? Still feels like he's basically blowing smoke.
6. I read about domestication of his judgment. How much does this cost/what's the effort entailed? I can't seem to get a sense of this.
7. Will domestication even be permitted since it was a default judgment?
8. At that time, can I challenge it again on grounds that I never knew of the claim to begin with? Better to do that or something else?
Finally,
9. What would you do in this situation?
Thanks for your thoughts.