JAMES123321
Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? idaho
HELLO FROM JAY,
I RECENTLY WENT TO COURT ON A SMALL CLAIMS CASE. I WAS THE PLAINTIF. THE DEFENDANT DID COMMIT PERJURY ON STAND IN
COURT. THE DEFENDANT WAS FROM A STATE LOTTERY BOARD AND DID CLAIM I NEEDED A TORT. THE CASE WAS FROM MENTAL ANGUISH
OVER A MISREPRESENTATION. THE ACTUAL CASE STATED MENTAL ANGUISH AND OVER MISREPRESENTATION. THE JUDGE THEN RULED IN
FAVOR FOR THE DEFENDANT IN THE CASE. THE SMALL CLAIMS CASE WAS ON OCTOBER 25. I THEN DID REPORT THE WHOLE AFFAIR TO
THE POLICE. I HAVE YET THEN TO RE-CONTACT THE POLICE OR JUDGE OR COURT ON THE MATTER. IT CAN BE PROVED THAT THE
DEFENDANT DID COMMIT PERJURY. I DID SEND A FAX EXPLAINING THE MATTER LIKE THIS TO ANOTHER SMALL CLAIMS JUDGE IN THE
SAME COURT. ANY SUGGESTIONS ON THIS MATTER. THE JUDGE RULED IN FAVOR IN THE DEFENDANT AND THE RULING WAS FAILURE TO
FILE A TORT.
HELLO FROM JAY,
I RECENTLY WENT TO COURT ON A SMALL CLAIMS CASE. I WAS THE PLAINTIF. THE DEFENDANT DID COMMIT PERJURY ON STAND IN
COURT. THE DEFENDANT WAS FROM A STATE LOTTERY BOARD AND DID CLAIM I NEEDED A TORT. THE CASE WAS FROM MENTAL ANGUISH
OVER A MISREPRESENTATION. THE ACTUAL CASE STATED MENTAL ANGUISH AND OVER MISREPRESENTATION. THE JUDGE THEN RULED IN
FAVOR FOR THE DEFENDANT IN THE CASE. THE SMALL CLAIMS CASE WAS ON OCTOBER 25. I THEN DID REPORT THE WHOLE AFFAIR TO
THE POLICE. I HAVE YET THEN TO RE-CONTACT THE POLICE OR JUDGE OR COURT ON THE MATTER. IT CAN BE PROVED THAT THE
DEFENDANT DID COMMIT PERJURY. I DID SEND A FAX EXPLAINING THE MATTER LIKE THIS TO ANOTHER SMALL CLAIMS JUDGE IN THE
SAME COURT. ANY SUGGESTIONS ON THIS MATTER. THE JUDGE RULED IN FAVOR IN THE DEFENDANT AND THE RULING WAS FAILURE TO
FILE A TORT.
Last edited by a moderator:
