Stolen

[quincy]

Well he didn't send them to my friend she took his phone and took pictures of the pictures with her own phone if that makes sense and at the time he was 17 and I was also 17 when I sent him the pictures.

You and your boyfriend might want to discuss what to do about the nude photos with an attorney in your area.

Again, your friend exceeded the consent granted by your boyfriend to use the phone. She accessed private photos without authorization. She duplicated the photos without authorization. And she published the photos without consent.

If this is the same friend who was photographed drinking something in Spain, publishing that photograph of her in retaliation is not the way to handle the matter (https://forum.freeadvice.com/small-claims-courts-24/underage-drinking-629500.html).

I hope she is no longer your friend.

 

[not2cleverRed]

Well he didn't send them to my friend she took his phone and took pictures of the pictures with her own phone if that makes sense and at the time he was 17 and I was also 17 when I sent him the pictures.

So you're all stupid.

On the up side, if she took a picture of the pictures, then it does not look like the pictures were distributed electronically.

But really, this is underage (child) pornography. No one should have stuff like that on their phone - not even a 12 year old.

 

[Zigner]

You and your boyfriend might want to discuss what to do about the nude photos with an attorney in your area.

Again, your friend exceeded the consent granted by your boyfriend to use the phone. She accessed private photos without authorization.

So says the 17 year old kid who's now in trouble with his girlfriend and, possibly, the law.[/QUOTE]

 

[quincy]

So you're all stupid.

On the up side, if she took a picture of the pictures, then it does not look like the pictures were distributed electronically.

But really, this is underage (child) pornography. No one should have stuff like that on their phone - not even a 12 year old.

The friend sent the nude photos to those in a group chat on Facebook, so the pictures were distributed.

There are obvious problems in trying to seek a legal solution to the illegal phone access and nude photo distribution. Every one in this brilliant trio of teens has violated laws, with some violations more serious than others. It would be hard for Lizzy1011 to pursue an action against the friend without Lizzy1011 and her boyfriend being charged with possession of child pornography. And, technically, all of those in the group chat could be charged with possession of child pornography. They would be wise to delete the photos.

The parents of these children must be so proud.

 

[not2cleverRed]

The friend sent the nude photos to those in a group chat on Facebook, so the pictures were distributed.

There are obvious problems in trying to seek a legal solution to the illegal phone access and nude photo distribution. Every one in this brilliant trio of teens has violated laws, with some violations more serious than others. It would be hard for Lizzy1011 to pursue an action against the friend without Lizzy1011 and her boyfriend being charged with possession of child pornography. And, technically, all of those in the group chat could be charged with possession of child pornography. They would be wise to delete the photos.

The parents of these children must be so proud.

We initially thought (or at least I did) that the photos were sent from one phone to another - which is a crime, and would leaves the boyfriend arguing that although it was his phone, he didn't send them.

Legally, Lizzy doesn't care a flip what (bad things) happen to the girl, but perhaps has a vested interest in her boyfriend.

 

[Ohiogal]

Well he didn't send them to my friend she took his phone and took pictures of the pictures with her own phone if that makes sense and at the time he was 17 and I was also 17 when I sent him the pictures.

You can still be in legal trouble for making child pornography. Or don't you care about that?

 

[quincy]

We initially thought (or at least I did) that the photos were sent from one phone to another - which is a crime, and would leaves the boyfriend arguing that although it was his phone, he didn't send them.

Legally, Lizzy doesn't care a flip what (bad things) happen to the girl, but perhaps has a vested interest in her boyfriend.

Creating child pornography, possessing child pornography and distributing child pornography are all crimes.

It appears the boyfriend has little to argue in his defense.