ENASNI, I still get two more edits to fix my post like you, right? ("row" for "two"...?) Nah, i'll leave it. Feels more honest...
rmet, you WERE mucking up this post. I fail to see how the quote
There is no reason to have an attitude just because you don't like the answer you get to your post. There are reasons both you and the person you want to sue, avoided your insurance companies and why you opened your post with this statement...
is even remotely helpful to formattssake's position. I was correct to criticize other posters on this thread, unless you can explain how
**A: next time find a girl with naturally big boobs.
and
I'm concerned just what kind of boob job you can get for five grand. Was that for just one?
are "[needing] more information to give advice." There are other examples in other posts, but my modem loads this site too slowly for me to post (though the contest for the "Dumbest Case" or whatever is up there).
Your post was helpful, so I'm still not sure how you felt I was attacking you. Just because I don't feel you were initially helpful in my other post doesn't mean I feel that way about this one. I'm able to separate my feelings in one thread from another. Are you? I've spent much of the day browsing this forum to find my answer before asking a question. I've seen many people post with situations that were important to them, only to be met with look-down-your-nose sarcasm or outright ridicule. Perhaps I'm expecting too much from an internet forum, but I guess I expected a higher standard from a site that claims to be the "Leading Legal Advice Site for Consumers".
And as for "[attacking] senior members", I'm sorry you feel that way. If I see someone being an @$$ or not taking someone else's dilemma seriously, I'm gonna call it and I could care less how many posts you have. If you label this trolling, so be it. Perhaps it's not such a bad thing then. And, though I can't speak for the OP, if I had asked a serious question and gotten some of the responses this thread generated, I'd appreciate someone calling it for what it is. Perhaps I take my responsibilities as a senior member on my other forums too seriously and have expected too much from you all here. When I answer, I try to give a somewhat in depth answer and I always try to "condemn" posts that make light of another person's misfortune. Perhaps you all get a lot of bogus posts here and have become jaded. Dunno. Again, maybe I'm taking this site too seriously and placing too much weight on the byline. Or maybe you reply to 300 posts a day and don't have much time for in-depth responses. If so, bravo... I guess.
Now, formattssake, I apologize profusely if I've hijacked your thread. I tend to get a little hot when I see what I consider to be callouslness to another's misfortune. If I've overstepped my bounds, I beg your forgiveness. I will salvage what little "calmness" I have left and leave this post behind. I gave what little advice I have and I hope it's helpful. FWIW, I hope you find a fair and equitable solution to your dilemma. And on a COMPLETELY different topic, from one Texan to another: Go Lance!
